The effectiveness of protected areas at achieving nature conservation goals varies widely, but the reasons for this variation are understudied. We argue that an important, but often neglected, factor is the history of institutional development that pre-dates protected area establishment. Through a comparative analysis of pathways of institutional development in Calakmul and Maya Biosphere Reserves, internationally adjoining protected areas in Mexico and Guatemala, we demonstrate that differences in farmer and community-level conservation behavior between the two reserves are the result of differences in land tenure systems that pre-date reserve establishment. Differences in land tenure systems resulted in a lower population density, greater tenure security, and greater economic and political equality in the Calakmul Biosphere Reserve. All of these factors influenced farmers and communities in the Calakmul Biosphere Reserve to have more favorable attitudes towards conservation, conserve more forest on both individual and community managed land, and to create more conservation reserves on both land types. These differences are rooted in the system of land distribution and political organization during the 1970s and 1980s, before protected area establishment, when both areas were agricultural frontiers. As a result of these political processes that pre-date reserve creation, farmers and communities in Calakmul hold more land and hold it more equitably, have less access to surplus labor for expanding commercial production, and have a political system that shares benefits from forest conservation more equitably when compared to Maya. Our work highlights the value of understanding historical political and institutional conditions in the design and development of effective protected areas. Protected areas located in areas with greater economic and political equality may be more effective at conserving nature.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Number of pages||11|
|Journal||Global Environmental Change|
|State||Published - May 2018|
Bibliographical noteFunding Information:
We humbly acknowledge the time and interest our informants in the Maya forest took to answer our questions. We received funding from the National Science Foundation (SBE 0721745 and CHE-1313932 to CRS) and the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture , (McIntire Stennis Project # 1013165 to FF), and support from Dartmouth College’s Environmental Studies Program and the Texas A&M Department of Ecosystem Science and Management . David Lutz helped us make the map. We received helpful comments on this manuscript from Arun Agrawal, Bayron Milian and three anonymous reviewers.
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
- Protected areas