Institutional characteristics associated with receipt of emergency care for obstructive pyelonephritis at community hospitals

Michael S. Borofsky, Dawn Walter, Huilin Li, Ojas Shah, David S. Goldfarb, R. Ernest Sosa, Danil V. Makarov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Delivering the recommended care is an important quality measure that has been insufficiently studied in urology. Obstructive pyelonephritis is a suitable case study for this focus because many patients do not receive such care, although guidelines advocate decompression. We determined the influence of hospital factors, particularly familiarity with urolithiasis, on the likelihood of decompression in such patients. Materials and Methods: We used the NIS from 2002 to 2011 to retrospectively identify patients admitted to community hospitals with severe infection and ureteral calculi. Hospital familiarity with nephrolithiasis was estimated by calculating hospital stone volume (divided into quartiles) and hospital treatment intensity (the decompression rate in patients with ureteral calculi and no infection). After calculating national estimates we performed logistic regression to determine the association between the receipt of decompression and hospital stone volume, controlling for treatment intensity and other covariates thought to be associated with receiving recommended care. Results: Of an estimated 107,848 patients with obstructive pyelonephritis 27.4% failed to undergo decompression. Discrepancies were greatest between hospitals with the highest and lowest stone volumes (76% vs 25%, OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.94-3.96, p <0.01) as well as high and low treatment intensity (78% vs 37%, p <0.01). Conclusions: High hospital stone volume and treatment intensity were associated with an increased likelihood of receiving decompression. Such findings might be useful to identify hospitals and regions where access to quality urological care should be augmented.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)851-856
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume193
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2015

Fingerprint

Pyelonephritis
Community Hospital
Emergency Medical Services
Decompression
Ureteral Calculi
High-Volume Hospitals
Nephrolithiasis
Urolithiasis
Quality of Health Care
Urology
Therapeutics
Infection
Logistic Models
Guidelines

Keywords

  • hospitals, community
  • nephrolithiasis
  • pyelonephritis
  • sepsis
  • ureteral calculi

Cite this

Institutional characteristics associated with receipt of emergency care for obstructive pyelonephritis at community hospitals. / Borofsky, Michael S.; Walter, Dawn; Li, Huilin; Shah, Ojas; Goldfarb, David S.; Sosa, R. Ernest; Makarov, Danil V.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 193, No. 3, 01.03.2015, p. 851-856.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Borofsky, Michael S. ; Walter, Dawn ; Li, Huilin ; Shah, Ojas ; Goldfarb, David S. ; Sosa, R. Ernest ; Makarov, Danil V. / Institutional characteristics associated with receipt of emergency care for obstructive pyelonephritis at community hospitals. In: Journal of Urology. 2015 ; Vol. 193, No. 3. pp. 851-856.
@article{182f8732e9c54c2da62c34fe5a91e2a6,
title = "Institutional characteristics associated with receipt of emergency care for obstructive pyelonephritis at community hospitals",
abstract = "Purpose: Delivering the recommended care is an important quality measure that has been insufficiently studied in urology. Obstructive pyelonephritis is a suitable case study for this focus because many patients do not receive such care, although guidelines advocate decompression. We determined the influence of hospital factors, particularly familiarity with urolithiasis, on the likelihood of decompression in such patients. Materials and Methods: We used the NIS from 2002 to 2011 to retrospectively identify patients admitted to community hospitals with severe infection and ureteral calculi. Hospital familiarity with nephrolithiasis was estimated by calculating hospital stone volume (divided into quartiles) and hospital treatment intensity (the decompression rate in patients with ureteral calculi and no infection). After calculating national estimates we performed logistic regression to determine the association between the receipt of decompression and hospital stone volume, controlling for treatment intensity and other covariates thought to be associated with receiving recommended care. Results: Of an estimated 107,848 patients with obstructive pyelonephritis 27.4{\%} failed to undergo decompression. Discrepancies were greatest between hospitals with the highest and lowest stone volumes (76{\%} vs 25{\%}, OR 2.77, 95{\%} CI 1.94-3.96, p <0.01) as well as high and low treatment intensity (78{\%} vs 37{\%}, p <0.01). Conclusions: High hospital stone volume and treatment intensity were associated with an increased likelihood of receiving decompression. Such findings might be useful to identify hospitals and regions where access to quality urological care should be augmented.",
keywords = "hospitals, community, nephrolithiasis, pyelonephritis, sepsis, ureteral calculi",
author = "Borofsky, {Michael S.} and Dawn Walter and Huilin Li and Ojas Shah and Goldfarb, {David S.} and Sosa, {R. Ernest} and Makarov, {Danil V.}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "193",
pages = "851--856",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Institutional characteristics associated with receipt of emergency care for obstructive pyelonephritis at community hospitals

AU - Borofsky, Michael S.

AU - Walter, Dawn

AU - Li, Huilin

AU - Shah, Ojas

AU - Goldfarb, David S.

AU - Sosa, R. Ernest

AU - Makarov, Danil V.

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - Purpose: Delivering the recommended care is an important quality measure that has been insufficiently studied in urology. Obstructive pyelonephritis is a suitable case study for this focus because many patients do not receive such care, although guidelines advocate decompression. We determined the influence of hospital factors, particularly familiarity with urolithiasis, on the likelihood of decompression in such patients. Materials and Methods: We used the NIS from 2002 to 2011 to retrospectively identify patients admitted to community hospitals with severe infection and ureteral calculi. Hospital familiarity with nephrolithiasis was estimated by calculating hospital stone volume (divided into quartiles) and hospital treatment intensity (the decompression rate in patients with ureteral calculi and no infection). After calculating national estimates we performed logistic regression to determine the association between the receipt of decompression and hospital stone volume, controlling for treatment intensity and other covariates thought to be associated with receiving recommended care. Results: Of an estimated 107,848 patients with obstructive pyelonephritis 27.4% failed to undergo decompression. Discrepancies were greatest between hospitals with the highest and lowest stone volumes (76% vs 25%, OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.94-3.96, p <0.01) as well as high and low treatment intensity (78% vs 37%, p <0.01). Conclusions: High hospital stone volume and treatment intensity were associated with an increased likelihood of receiving decompression. Such findings might be useful to identify hospitals and regions where access to quality urological care should be augmented.

AB - Purpose: Delivering the recommended care is an important quality measure that has been insufficiently studied in urology. Obstructive pyelonephritis is a suitable case study for this focus because many patients do not receive such care, although guidelines advocate decompression. We determined the influence of hospital factors, particularly familiarity with urolithiasis, on the likelihood of decompression in such patients. Materials and Methods: We used the NIS from 2002 to 2011 to retrospectively identify patients admitted to community hospitals with severe infection and ureteral calculi. Hospital familiarity with nephrolithiasis was estimated by calculating hospital stone volume (divided into quartiles) and hospital treatment intensity (the decompression rate in patients with ureteral calculi and no infection). After calculating national estimates we performed logistic regression to determine the association between the receipt of decompression and hospital stone volume, controlling for treatment intensity and other covariates thought to be associated with receiving recommended care. Results: Of an estimated 107,848 patients with obstructive pyelonephritis 27.4% failed to undergo decompression. Discrepancies were greatest between hospitals with the highest and lowest stone volumes (76% vs 25%, OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.94-3.96, p <0.01) as well as high and low treatment intensity (78% vs 37%, p <0.01). Conclusions: High hospital stone volume and treatment intensity were associated with an increased likelihood of receiving decompression. Such findings might be useful to identify hospitals and regions where access to quality urological care should be augmented.

KW - hospitals, community

KW - nephrolithiasis

KW - pyelonephritis

KW - sepsis

KW - ureteral calculi

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922670152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922670152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.009

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.009

M3 - Article

VL - 193

SP - 851

EP - 856

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 3

ER -