Influences of seasonality and habitat quality on Great Lakes coastal wetland fish community composition and diets

Sara N. Diller, Anna M. Harrison, Kurt P. Kowalski, Valerie J. Brady, Jan J.H. Ciborowski, Matthew J. Cooper, Joshua D. Dumke, Joseph P. Gathman, Carl R. Ruetz, Donald G. Uzarski, Douglas A. Wilcox, Jeffrey S. Schaeffer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Great Lakes coastal wetlands (GLCW) have been severely degraded by anthropogenic activity over the last several decades despite their critical role in fish production. Many Great Lakes fish species use coastal wetland habitats for spawning, feeding, shelter, and nurseries throughout the year. The goal of our study was to compare GLCW fish community composition in the spring, summer, and fall months and investigate how water quality relates to fish diversity, the presence of functional groups, and juvenile fish diets. We summarized fish data collected from GLCW across the basin and used the coastal wetland monitoring program’s water quality-land use indicator to quantify water quality. Basin-wide, we found taxonomic and functional group differences in community composition among three sampling seasons, as well as across the range of water quality. Water quality was positively associated with the abundance of small cyprinids and the relative abundance of some habitat and reproductive specialists. Seasonal differences were also observed for many of these functional groups, with more temperature- and pollution-sensitive fishes captured in the spring and more nest-spawning fishes captured in the summer and fall. In our diet study, we found that age-0 fish primarily consumed zooplankton in the fall, whereas age-1 fish primarily consumed macroinvertebrates in the spring. Moreover, wetland quality was positively associated with trichopteran prey abundance. We concluded that taxonomic and functional composition of fish communities in GLCW vary markedly with respect to water quality and season. Thus, a full understanding of communities across a gradient of quality requires multi-season sampling.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)439-460
Number of pages22
JournalWetlands Ecology and Management
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We thank Dr. Gary Lamberti (University of Notre Dame) for his assistance with collecting data for this project. We offer additional thanks to the field crews who braved the elements to complete all of the sampling. Lastly, we thank all reviewers for their constructive feedback. Funding was provided by the Great Lakes National Program Office under the USEPA, Grant Number GL-00E00612-0, as part of the U.S. federal government’s Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI). Although this research is partly funded by USEPA, it has not been subjected to the agency’s required peer and policy review. Thus, it does not necessarily reflect the views of the agency and no official endorsement should be inferred. The U.S. Geological Survey component of the study was funded by GLRI. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U. S. Government. This is publication number 162 of the Central Michigan University Institute for Great Lakes Research, and publication number 642 of the University of Minnesota Duluth’s Natural Resources Research Institute.

Funding Information:
We thank Dr. Gary Lamberti (University of Notre Dame) for his assistance with collecting data for this project. We offer additional thanks to the field crews who braved the elements to complete all of the sampling. Lastly, we thank all reviewers for their constructive feedback. Funding was provided by the Great Lakes National Program Office under the USEPA, Grant Number GL-00E00612-0, as part of the U.S. federal government’s Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI). Although this research is partly funded by USEPA, it has not been subjected to the agency’s required peer and policy review. Thus, it does not necessarily reflect the views of the agency and no official endorsement should be inferred. The U.S. Geological Survey component of the study was funded by GLRI. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U. S. Government. This is publication number 162 of the Central Michigan University Institute for Great Lakes Research, and publication number 642 of the University of Minnesota Duluth’s Natural Resources Research Institute.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Keywords

  • Coastal wetlands
  • Fish diets
  • Fish diversity
  • Functional groups
  • Great lakes
  • Water quality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Influences of seasonality and habitat quality on Great Lakes coastal wetland fish community composition and diets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this