TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of Preoperative Therapy on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Adenocarcinoma of the Ampulla of Vater
AU - Cloyd, Jordan M.
AU - Wang, Huamin
AU - Overman, Michael
AU - Zhao, Jun
AU - Denbo, Jason W
AU - Prakash, Laura
AU - Kim, Michael P.
AU - Shroff, Rachna
AU - Javle, Milind
AU - Varadhachary, Gauri R.
AU - Fogelman, David
AU - Wolff, Robert A.
AU - Koay, Eugene J.
AU - Das, Prajnan
AU - Maitra, Anirban
AU - Aloia, Thomas A.
AU - Vauthey, Jean Nicolas
AU - Fleming, Jason B.
AU - Lee, Jeffrey E.
AU - Katz, Matthew H.G.
PY - 2017/7/1
Y1 - 2017/7/1
N2 - Introduction: Although preoperative therapy is increasingly administered to patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, the role of preoperative therapy for patients with adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater is undefined. Methods: All patients with ampullary cancer who were evaluated between 1999 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Differences in clinicopathologic characteristics, perioperative complications, and overall survival were compared between patients who underwent surgery de novo and those who received preoperative therapy before pancreatoduodenectomy. Results: A total of 142 patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy: 43 (30.3%) who received preoperative therapy and 99 (69.7%) who did not. Preoperative therapy consisted of chemoradiation (65%), chemotherapy (7%), or both (28%). Patients who underwent surgery first had a lower comorbidity index (p < 0.05) and were more likely to receive postoperative chemotherapy (p < 0.01) and chemoradiation (p < 0.0001). Tumors resected de novo were larger (p < 0.01) and had a different histopathologic subtype distribution (p < 0.01) on final pathology than those resected following preoperative therapy. Six (14.0%) patients demonstrated a complete pathologic response. There were no differences in rates of postoperative complications, mortality, readmission, LR (9.1 vs. 7.0%), median survival (107 vs. 146 months), or 5-year overall survival (60.6 vs. 70.4%). On multivariate cox regression analysis, the receipt of preoperative therapy was not associated with improved survival (odds ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56–2.31). Conclusions: Although these data do not support the routine administration of preoperative therapy to all patients with ampullary cancer, the delivery of preoperative therapy represents an alternative strategy that is associated with excellent short- and long-term outcomes and appears appropriate for a subset of patients.
AB - Introduction: Although preoperative therapy is increasingly administered to patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, the role of preoperative therapy for patients with adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater is undefined. Methods: All patients with ampullary cancer who were evaluated between 1999 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Differences in clinicopathologic characteristics, perioperative complications, and overall survival were compared between patients who underwent surgery de novo and those who received preoperative therapy before pancreatoduodenectomy. Results: A total of 142 patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy: 43 (30.3%) who received preoperative therapy and 99 (69.7%) who did not. Preoperative therapy consisted of chemoradiation (65%), chemotherapy (7%), or both (28%). Patients who underwent surgery first had a lower comorbidity index (p < 0.05) and were more likely to receive postoperative chemotherapy (p < 0.01) and chemoradiation (p < 0.0001). Tumors resected de novo were larger (p < 0.01) and had a different histopathologic subtype distribution (p < 0.01) on final pathology than those resected following preoperative therapy. Six (14.0%) patients demonstrated a complete pathologic response. There were no differences in rates of postoperative complications, mortality, readmission, LR (9.1 vs. 7.0%), median survival (107 vs. 146 months), or 5-year overall survival (60.6 vs. 70.4%). On multivariate cox regression analysis, the receipt of preoperative therapy was not associated with improved survival (odds ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56–2.31). Conclusions: Although these data do not support the routine administration of preoperative therapy to all patients with ampullary cancer, the delivery of preoperative therapy represents an alternative strategy that is associated with excellent short- and long-term outcomes and appears appropriate for a subset of patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010819032&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85010819032&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1245/s10434-017-5777-7
DO - 10.1245/s10434-017-5777-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 28124275
AN - SCOPUS:85010819032
SN - 1068-9265
VL - 24
SP - 2031
EP - 2039
JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology
JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology
IS - 7
ER -