Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating on the immediate and 6-month dentin bonding of three universal adhesives

Ana Sezinando, Issis Luque-Martinez, Miguel Angel Muñoz, Alessandra Reis, Alessandro D. Loguercio, Jorge Perdigão

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To test the influence of a hydrophobic resin coating (HC) on the immediate (24h) and 6-month (6m) microtensile dentin bond strengths (μTBS) and nanoleakage (NL) of three universal adhesives applied in self-etch (SE) or in etch-and-rinse (ER) mode. Methods Sixty caries-free extracted third molars were assigned to 12 experimental groups resulting from the combination of the factors "adhesive system" (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive [SBU], 3M ESPE; All-Bond Universal [ABU], Bisco Inc.; and G-Bond Plus [GBP], GC Corporation); "adhesive strategy" (SE or ER); "hydrophobic resin coating" [HC] (with or without Heliobond, Ivoclar Vivadent); and "storage time" (24h or 6m). Specimens were prepared for μTBS testing - (24h) half of the beams were immediately tested under tension; and (6m) the other half was stored in distilled water (37 °C) for 6m prior to testing. For each tooth, two beams were randomly selected for NL evaluation for both evaluation times. Data were analyzed for each adhesive system using three-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (α = 0.05). Results μTBS: (24h): In SE mode, HC resulted in statistically greater mean μTBS for all adhesives. (6m): When HC was not used the mean μTBS for SBU/ER, ABU/ER, GBP/ER and SBU/SE decreased significantly. NL: (24h): SBU/ER, ABU/ER and GBP/SE resulted in a significant reduction in NL when HC was applied. (6m): No significant reduction was observed for SBU/ER or for SBU/SE regardless of the use of HC. Significance The application of a hydrophobic resin coating improved the 24h and the 6m performances of all three adhesives systems in SE mode.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e236-e246
JournalDental Materials
Volume31
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

Dentin
Adhesives
Resins
Coatings
Third Molar
Testing
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Scotchbond
Analysis of Variance
Tooth
Water
G-Bond
Industry

Keywords

  • Dental bonding
  • Hydrophobic resin coat
  • Microtensile bond strength
  • Nanoleakage
  • Universal adhesive systems

Cite this

Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating on the immediate and 6-month dentin bonding of three universal adhesives. / Sezinando, Ana; Luque-Martinez, Issis; Muñoz, Miguel Angel; Reis, Alessandra; Loguercio, Alessandro D.; Perdigão, Jorge.

In: Dental Materials, Vol. 31, No. 10, 01.10.2015, p. e236-e246.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sezinando, Ana ; Luque-Martinez, Issis ; Muñoz, Miguel Angel ; Reis, Alessandra ; Loguercio, Alessandro D. ; Perdigão, Jorge. / Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating on the immediate and 6-month dentin bonding of three universal adhesives. In: Dental Materials. 2015 ; Vol. 31, No. 10. pp. e236-e246.
@article{01e19c5fc3094aa2a81608c3a8807d45,
title = "Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating on the immediate and 6-month dentin bonding of three universal adhesives",
abstract = "Objective To test the influence of a hydrophobic resin coating (HC) on the immediate (24h) and 6-month (6m) microtensile dentin bond strengths (μTBS) and nanoleakage (NL) of three universal adhesives applied in self-etch (SE) or in etch-and-rinse (ER) mode. Methods Sixty caries-free extracted third molars were assigned to 12 experimental groups resulting from the combination of the factors {"}adhesive system{"} (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive [SBU], 3M ESPE; All-Bond Universal [ABU], Bisco Inc.; and G-Bond Plus [GBP], GC Corporation); {"}adhesive strategy{"} (SE or ER); {"}hydrophobic resin coating{"} [HC] (with or without Heliobond, Ivoclar Vivadent); and {"}storage time{"} (24h or 6m). Specimens were prepared for μTBS testing - (24h) half of the beams were immediately tested under tension; and (6m) the other half was stored in distilled water (37 °C) for 6m prior to testing. For each tooth, two beams were randomly selected for NL evaluation for both evaluation times. Data were analyzed for each adhesive system using three-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (α = 0.05). Results μTBS: (24h): In SE mode, HC resulted in statistically greater mean μTBS for all adhesives. (6m): When HC was not used the mean μTBS for SBU/ER, ABU/ER, GBP/ER and SBU/SE decreased significantly. NL: (24h): SBU/ER, ABU/ER and GBP/SE resulted in a significant reduction in NL when HC was applied. (6m): No significant reduction was observed for SBU/ER or for SBU/SE regardless of the use of HC. Significance The application of a hydrophobic resin coating improved the 24h and the 6m performances of all three adhesives systems in SE mode.",
keywords = "Dental bonding, Hydrophobic resin coat, Microtensile bond strength, Nanoleakage, Universal adhesive systems",
author = "Ana Sezinando and Issis Luque-Martinez and Mu{\~n}oz, {Miguel Angel} and Alessandra Reis and Loguercio, {Alessandro D.} and Jorge Perdig{\~a}o",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.dental.2015.07.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "e236--e246",
journal = "Dental Materials",
issn = "0109-5641",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating on the immediate and 6-month dentin bonding of three universal adhesives

AU - Sezinando, Ana

AU - Luque-Martinez, Issis

AU - Muñoz, Miguel Angel

AU - Reis, Alessandra

AU - Loguercio, Alessandro D.

AU - Perdigão, Jorge

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - Objective To test the influence of a hydrophobic resin coating (HC) on the immediate (24h) and 6-month (6m) microtensile dentin bond strengths (μTBS) and nanoleakage (NL) of three universal adhesives applied in self-etch (SE) or in etch-and-rinse (ER) mode. Methods Sixty caries-free extracted third molars were assigned to 12 experimental groups resulting from the combination of the factors "adhesive system" (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive [SBU], 3M ESPE; All-Bond Universal [ABU], Bisco Inc.; and G-Bond Plus [GBP], GC Corporation); "adhesive strategy" (SE or ER); "hydrophobic resin coating" [HC] (with or without Heliobond, Ivoclar Vivadent); and "storage time" (24h or 6m). Specimens were prepared for μTBS testing - (24h) half of the beams were immediately tested under tension; and (6m) the other half was stored in distilled water (37 °C) for 6m prior to testing. For each tooth, two beams were randomly selected for NL evaluation for both evaluation times. Data were analyzed for each adhesive system using three-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (α = 0.05). Results μTBS: (24h): In SE mode, HC resulted in statistically greater mean μTBS for all adhesives. (6m): When HC was not used the mean μTBS for SBU/ER, ABU/ER, GBP/ER and SBU/SE decreased significantly. NL: (24h): SBU/ER, ABU/ER and GBP/SE resulted in a significant reduction in NL when HC was applied. (6m): No significant reduction was observed for SBU/ER or for SBU/SE regardless of the use of HC. Significance The application of a hydrophobic resin coating improved the 24h and the 6m performances of all three adhesives systems in SE mode.

AB - Objective To test the influence of a hydrophobic resin coating (HC) on the immediate (24h) and 6-month (6m) microtensile dentin bond strengths (μTBS) and nanoleakage (NL) of three universal adhesives applied in self-etch (SE) or in etch-and-rinse (ER) mode. Methods Sixty caries-free extracted third molars were assigned to 12 experimental groups resulting from the combination of the factors "adhesive system" (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive [SBU], 3M ESPE; All-Bond Universal [ABU], Bisco Inc.; and G-Bond Plus [GBP], GC Corporation); "adhesive strategy" (SE or ER); "hydrophobic resin coating" [HC] (with or without Heliobond, Ivoclar Vivadent); and "storage time" (24h or 6m). Specimens were prepared for μTBS testing - (24h) half of the beams were immediately tested under tension; and (6m) the other half was stored in distilled water (37 °C) for 6m prior to testing. For each tooth, two beams were randomly selected for NL evaluation for both evaluation times. Data were analyzed for each adhesive system using three-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (α = 0.05). Results μTBS: (24h): In SE mode, HC resulted in statistically greater mean μTBS for all adhesives. (6m): When HC was not used the mean μTBS for SBU/ER, ABU/ER, GBP/ER and SBU/SE decreased significantly. NL: (24h): SBU/ER, ABU/ER and GBP/SE resulted in a significant reduction in NL when HC was applied. (6m): No significant reduction was observed for SBU/ER or for SBU/SE regardless of the use of HC. Significance The application of a hydrophobic resin coating improved the 24h and the 6m performances of all three adhesives systems in SE mode.

KW - Dental bonding

KW - Hydrophobic resin coat

KW - Microtensile bond strength

KW - Nanoleakage

KW - Universal adhesive systems

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942551281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942551281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dental.2015.07.002

DO - 10.1016/j.dental.2015.07.002

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - e236-e246

JO - Dental Materials

JF - Dental Materials

SN - 0109-5641

IS - 10

ER -