Inequity in consumption of goods and services adds to racial-ethnic disparities in air pollution exposure

Christopher M Tessum, Joshua S. Apte, Andrew L. Goodkind, Nicholas Z. Muller, Kimberley A. Mullins, David A. Paolella, Stephen Polasky, Nathaniel P Springer, Sumil Thakrar, Julian D. Marshall, Jason D Hill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) air pollution exposure is the largest environmental health risk factor in the United States. Here, we link PM2.5 exposure to the human activities responsible for PM2.5 pollution. We use these results to explore "pollution inequity": The difference between the environmental health damage caused by a racial- ethnic group and the damage that group experiences. We show that, in the United States, PM2.5 exposure is disproportionately caused by consumption of goods and services mainly by the non-Hispanic white majority, but disproportionately inhaled by black and Hispanic minorities. On average, non-Hispanic whites experience a "pollution advantage": They experience ∼17% less air pollution exposure than is caused by their consumption. Blacks and Hispanics on average bear a "pollution burden" of 56% and 63% excess exposure, respectively, relative to the exposure caused by their consumption. The total disparity is caused as much by how much people consume as by how much pollution they breathe. Differences in the types of goods and services consumed by each group are less important. PM2.5 exposures declined ∼50% during 2002-2015 for all three racial-ethnic groups, but pollution inequity has remained high.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)6001-6006
Number of pages6
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume116
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Environmental Health
Air Pollution
Hispanic Americans
Ethnic Groups
Particulate Matter
Human Activities

Keywords

  • Air quality
  • Environmental justice
  • Fine particulate matter
  • Input- output
  • Life cycle assessment

Cite this

Inequity in consumption of goods and services adds to racial-ethnic disparities in air pollution exposure. / Tessum, Christopher M; Apte, Joshua S.; Goodkind, Andrew L.; Muller, Nicholas Z.; Mullins, Kimberley A.; Paolella, David A.; Polasky, Stephen; Springer, Nathaniel P; Thakrar, Sumil; Marshall, Julian D.; Hill, Jason D.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 116, No. 13, 01.01.2019, p. 6001-6006.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tessum, Christopher M ; Apte, Joshua S. ; Goodkind, Andrew L. ; Muller, Nicholas Z. ; Mullins, Kimberley A. ; Paolella, David A. ; Polasky, Stephen ; Springer, Nathaniel P ; Thakrar, Sumil ; Marshall, Julian D. ; Hill, Jason D. / Inequity in consumption of goods and services adds to racial-ethnic disparities in air pollution exposure. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2019 ; Vol. 116, No. 13. pp. 6001-6006.
@article{8f085a64cf59446983f4a04e47880d7f,
title = "Inequity in consumption of goods and services adds to racial-ethnic disparities in air pollution exposure",
abstract = "Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) air pollution exposure is the largest environmental health risk factor in the United States. Here, we link PM2.5 exposure to the human activities responsible for PM2.5 pollution. We use these results to explore {"}pollution inequity{"}: The difference between the environmental health damage caused by a racial- ethnic group and the damage that group experiences. We show that, in the United States, PM2.5 exposure is disproportionately caused by consumption of goods and services mainly by the non-Hispanic white majority, but disproportionately inhaled by black and Hispanic minorities. On average, non-Hispanic whites experience a {"}pollution advantage{"}: They experience ∼17{\%} less air pollution exposure than is caused by their consumption. Blacks and Hispanics on average bear a {"}pollution burden{"} of 56{\%} and 63{\%} excess exposure, respectively, relative to the exposure caused by their consumption. The total disparity is caused as much by how much people consume as by how much pollution they breathe. Differences in the types of goods and services consumed by each group are less important. PM2.5 exposures declined ∼50{\%} during 2002-2015 for all three racial-ethnic groups, but pollution inequity has remained high.",
keywords = "Air quality, Environmental justice, Fine particulate matter, Input- output, Life cycle assessment",
author = "Tessum, {Christopher M} and Apte, {Joshua S.} and Goodkind, {Andrew L.} and Muller, {Nicholas Z.} and Mullins, {Kimberley A.} and Paolella, {David A.} and Stephen Polasky and Springer, {Nathaniel P} and Sumil Thakrar and Marshall, {Julian D.} and Hill, {Jason D}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1818859116",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "116",
pages = "6001--6006",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inequity in consumption of goods and services adds to racial-ethnic disparities in air pollution exposure

AU - Tessum, Christopher M

AU - Apte, Joshua S.

AU - Goodkind, Andrew L.

AU - Muller, Nicholas Z.

AU - Mullins, Kimberley A.

AU - Paolella, David A.

AU - Polasky, Stephen

AU - Springer, Nathaniel P

AU - Thakrar, Sumil

AU - Marshall, Julian D.

AU - Hill, Jason D

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) air pollution exposure is the largest environmental health risk factor in the United States. Here, we link PM2.5 exposure to the human activities responsible for PM2.5 pollution. We use these results to explore "pollution inequity": The difference between the environmental health damage caused by a racial- ethnic group and the damage that group experiences. We show that, in the United States, PM2.5 exposure is disproportionately caused by consumption of goods and services mainly by the non-Hispanic white majority, but disproportionately inhaled by black and Hispanic minorities. On average, non-Hispanic whites experience a "pollution advantage": They experience ∼17% less air pollution exposure than is caused by their consumption. Blacks and Hispanics on average bear a "pollution burden" of 56% and 63% excess exposure, respectively, relative to the exposure caused by their consumption. The total disparity is caused as much by how much people consume as by how much pollution they breathe. Differences in the types of goods and services consumed by each group are less important. PM2.5 exposures declined ∼50% during 2002-2015 for all three racial-ethnic groups, but pollution inequity has remained high.

AB - Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) air pollution exposure is the largest environmental health risk factor in the United States. Here, we link PM2.5 exposure to the human activities responsible for PM2.5 pollution. We use these results to explore "pollution inequity": The difference between the environmental health damage caused by a racial- ethnic group and the damage that group experiences. We show that, in the United States, PM2.5 exposure is disproportionately caused by consumption of goods and services mainly by the non-Hispanic white majority, but disproportionately inhaled by black and Hispanic minorities. On average, non-Hispanic whites experience a "pollution advantage": They experience ∼17% less air pollution exposure than is caused by their consumption. Blacks and Hispanics on average bear a "pollution burden" of 56% and 63% excess exposure, respectively, relative to the exposure caused by their consumption. The total disparity is caused as much by how much people consume as by how much pollution they breathe. Differences in the types of goods and services consumed by each group are less important. PM2.5 exposures declined ∼50% during 2002-2015 for all three racial-ethnic groups, but pollution inequity has remained high.

KW - Air quality

KW - Environmental justice

KW - Fine particulate matter

KW - Input- output

KW - Life cycle assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063946842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063946842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1818859116

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1818859116

M3 - Article

VL - 116

SP - 6001

EP - 6006

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 13

ER -