Industrial dynamics and the problem of nature

William Boyd, W. Scott Prudham, Rachel A. Schurman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

242 Scopus citations

Abstract

Existing literature suggests that food, fiber, and raw material sectors differ from manufacturing in significant ways. However, there is no analytical basis for engaging the particular challenges of nature-centered production, and thus the distinct ways that industrialization proceeds in extractive and cultivation-based industries. This article presents a framework for analyzing the difference that nature makes in these industries. Nature is seen as a set of obstacles, opportunities, and surprises that firms confront in their attempts to subordinate biophysical properties and processes to industrial production. Drawing an analogy from Marxian labor theory, we contrast the formal and real subsumption of nature to highlight the distinct ways in which biological systems - in marked contrast to extractive sectors - are industrialized and may be made to operate as productive forces in and of themselves. These concepts differentiate analytically between biologically based and nonbiologically based industries, building on theoretical and historical distinctions between extraction and cultivation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)555-570
Number of pages16
JournalSociety and Natural Resources
Volume14
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2001

Keywords

  • Agricultural biotechnology
  • Agriculture
  • Industrialization
  • Natural resource industries
  • Resource extraction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Industrial dynamics and the problem of nature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this