TY - JOUR
T1 - Individual Predictors of Language Treatment Response in Children With Developmental Language Disorder
T2 - A Systematic Review
AU - Ebert, Kerry Danahy
AU - Lee, Hae Ji
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
PY - 2024/8
Y1 - 2024/8
N2 - Purpose: Treatment response is the degree to which an individual benefits from a treatment. This systematic review sought to identify and synthesize research evidence regarding individual characteristics that predict language treatment response among children with developmental language disorder (DLD). Method: To be eligible for inclusion, articles needed to report results of an oral language treatment program in a group of children aged 4–10 years with identi-fied DLD and also include a quantitative analysis of the relation between one or more pretreatment child characteristics and the outcome of language treatment. Seven databases (Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Dis-sertations and Theses Global, Education Resources Information Center, Linguis-tics and Language Behavior Abstracts, PsycINFO, Medline, and Web of Sci-ence) were searched for articles in June and July 2021, with search updates conducted in May 2023. Studies were categorized by the type of treatment pro-vided, and results were synthesized qualitatively. Results: The review included 31 studies, 1,551 participants with DLD, and over 300 statistical tests of a predictor’s effect on language treatment response. Most studies (n = 21) included only monolingual speakers of English, with five studies including bilinguals and five including monolingual speakers of non-English languages. Language treatments targeted word learning in controlled or clinical conditions, grammatical learning in controlled or clinical conditions, or multiple language targets in clinical conditions. Predictors of treatment response are summarized across four categories: cognitive, demographic, pretreatment language levels, and other. Conclusions: There were relatively few significant tests of the predictors of lan-guage treatment response. A central limitation of the evidence is that most included studies were designed to consider language treatment efficacy, not predictors of treatment response. Increasing research attention to the question of predictors of language treatment response in children with DLD is needed to enhance treatment and optimize outcomes for individual children.
AB - Purpose: Treatment response is the degree to which an individual benefits from a treatment. This systematic review sought to identify and synthesize research evidence regarding individual characteristics that predict language treatment response among children with developmental language disorder (DLD). Method: To be eligible for inclusion, articles needed to report results of an oral language treatment program in a group of children aged 4–10 years with identi-fied DLD and also include a quantitative analysis of the relation between one or more pretreatment child characteristics and the outcome of language treatment. Seven databases (Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Dis-sertations and Theses Global, Education Resources Information Center, Linguis-tics and Language Behavior Abstracts, PsycINFO, Medline, and Web of Sci-ence) were searched for articles in June and July 2021, with search updates conducted in May 2023. Studies were categorized by the type of treatment pro-vided, and results were synthesized qualitatively. Results: The review included 31 studies, 1,551 participants with DLD, and over 300 statistical tests of a predictor’s effect on language treatment response. Most studies (n = 21) included only monolingual speakers of English, with five studies including bilinguals and five including monolingual speakers of non-English languages. Language treatments targeted word learning in controlled or clinical conditions, grammatical learning in controlled or clinical conditions, or multiple language targets in clinical conditions. Predictors of treatment response are summarized across four categories: cognitive, demographic, pretreatment language levels, and other. Conclusions: There were relatively few significant tests of the predictors of lan-guage treatment response. A central limitation of the evidence is that most included studies were designed to consider language treatment efficacy, not predictors of treatment response. Increasing research attention to the question of predictors of language treatment response in children with DLD is needed to enhance treatment and optimize outcomes for individual children.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85200827796&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85200827796&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2024_jslhr-23-00665
DO - 10.1044/2024_jslhr-23-00665
M3 - Review article
C2 - 38991168
AN - SCOPUS:85200827796
SN - 1092-4388
VL - 67
SP - 2708
EP - 2728
JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
IS - 8
ER -