Indirect foraminal decompression after lateral transpsoas interbody fusion: Clinical article

Christopher K. Kepler, Amit K. Sharma, Russel C. Huang, Dennis S. Meredith, Federico P. Girardi, Frank P. Cammisa, Andrew A. Sama

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

137 Scopus citations

Abstract

Object. Lateral transpsoas interbody fusion (LTIF) permits anterior column lumbar interbody fusion via a direct lateral approach. The authors sought to answer 3 questions. First, what is the effect of LTIF on lumbar foraminal area? Second, how does interbody cage placement affect intervertebral height? And third, how does the change in foraminal area and cage position correlate with changes in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) scores? Methods. Included patients underwent LTIF with or without posterior instrumentation and received preoperative and postoperative CT scans. Disc heights, neural foraminal area between adjacent-level pedicles, and anteroposterior cage position were measured from sagittal CT images. Preoperative and postoperative ODI and SF-12 scores were matched with the change in foraminal area from the clinically most severely affected side for analysis of the relationship between outcomes instruments and change in foraminal area. Results. Average foraminal area increased by 36.2 mm2, or 35% of the preoperative area (p < 0.01), without statistically significant differences by side, level, or anteroposterior cage position. Preoperative anterior and posterior disc heights measured 6.2 mm and 3.7 mm, respectively, compared with postoperative measurements of 9.8 mm (p < 0.01) and 6.3 mm (p < 0.01), respectively, without significant differences by level or cage position. Despite significant overall improvement in ODI and SF-12 scores, there was no correlation with foraminal area increase. Conclusions. Average foraminal area increased approximately 35% after cage placement without variation based on cage position. While ODI and SF-12 scores increased significantly, there was no significant association with cage position or foraminal area change, likely attributable to the multifactorial nature of preoperative pain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)329-333
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery: Spine
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Extreme lateral interbody fusion
  • Foraminal decompression
  • Indirect decompression
  • Lateral approach surgery
  • Lateral transpsoas interbody fusion
  • Lumbar interbody fusion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Indirect foraminal decompression after lateral transpsoas interbody fusion: Clinical article'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this