Indication alerts to improve problem list documentation

Anne Grauer, Jerard Kneifati-Hayek, Brian Reuland, Jo R. Applebaum, Jason S. Adelman, Robert A. Green, Jeanette Lisak-Phillips, David Liebovitz, Thomas F. Byrd, Preeti Kansal, Cheryl Wilkes, Suzanne Falck, Connie Larson, John Shilka, Elizabeth Vandril, Gordon D. Schiff, William L. Galanter, Bruce L. Lambert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Problem lists represent an integral component of high-quality care. However, they are often inaccurate and incomplete. We studied the effects of alerts integrated into the inpatient and outpatient computerized provider order entry systems to assist in adding problems to the problem list when ordering medications that lacked a corresponding indication.

METHODS: We analyzed medication orders from 2 healthcare systems that used an innovative indication alert. We collected data at site 1 between December 2018 and January 2020, and at site 2 between May and June 2021. We reviewed random samples of 100 charts from each site that had problems added in response to the alert. Outcomes were: (1) alert yield, the proportion of triggered alerts that led to a problem added and (2) problem accuracy, the proportion of problems placed that were accurate by chart review.

RESULTS: Alerts were triggered 131 134, and 6178 times at sites 1 and 2, respectively, resulting in a yield of 109 055 (83.2%) and 2874 (46.5%), P< .001. Orders were abandoned, for example, not completed, in 11.1% and 9.6% of orders, respectively, P<.001. Of the 100 sample problems, reviewers deemed 88% ± 3% and 91% ± 3% to be accurate, respectively, P = .65, with a mean of 90% ± 2%.

CONCLUSIONS: Indication alerts triggered by medication orders initiated in the absence of a justifying diagnosis were useful for populating problem lists, with yields of 83.2% and 46.5% at 2 healthcare systems. Problems were placed with a reasonable level of accuracy, with 90% ± 2% of problems deemed accurate based on chart review.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)909-917
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume29
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords

  • clinical
  • decision support systems
  • indication-based prescribing
  • medical records
  • problem list
  • problem-oriented
  • Inpatients
  • Humans
  • Medication Errors/prevention & control
  • Documentation
  • Medical Order Entry Systems
  • Decision Support Systems, Clinical

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Indication alerts to improve problem list documentation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this