TY - JOUR
T1 - Incorporating the Acclimation of Photosynthesis and Leaf Respiration in the Noah-MP Land Surface Model
T2 - Model Development and Evaluation
AU - Ren, Yanghang
AU - Wang, Han
AU - Harrison, Sandy P.
AU - Prentice, I. Colin
AU - Mengoli, Giulia
AU - Zhao, Long
AU - Reich, Peter B.
AU - Yang, Kun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Geophysical Union.
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - Realistic simulation of leaf photosynthetic and respiratory processes is needed for accurate prediction of the global carbon cycle. These two processes systematically acclimate to long-term environmental changes by adjusting photosynthetic and respiratory traits (e.g., the maximum photosynthetic capacity at 25°C (Vcmax,25) and the leaf respiration rate at 25°C (R25)) following increasingly well-understood principles. While some land surface models (LSMs) now account for thermal acclimation, they do so by assigning empirical parameterizations for individual plant functional types (PFTs). Here, we have implemented an Eco-Evolutionary Optimality (EEO)-based scheme to represent the universal acclimation of photosynthesis and leaf respiration to multiple environmental effects, and that therefore requires no PFT-specific parameterizations, in a standard version of the widely used LSM, Noah MP. We evaluated model performance with plant trait data from a 5-year experiment and extensive global field measurements, and carbon flux measurements from FLUXNET2015. We show that observed R25 and Vcmax,25 vary substantially both temporally and spatially within the same PFT (C.V. >20%). Our EEO-based scheme captures 62% of the temporal and 70% of the spatial variations in Vcmax,25 (73% and 54% of the variations in R25). The standard scheme underestimates gross primary production by 10% versus 2% for the EEO-based scheme and generates a larger spread in r (correlation coefficient) across flux sites (0.79 ± 0.16 vs. 0.84 ± 0.1, mean ± S.D.). The standard scheme greatly overestimates canopy respiration (bias: ∼200% vs. 8% for the EEO scheme), resulting in less CO2 uptake by terrestrial ecosystems. Our approach thus simulates climate-carbon coupling more realistically, with fewer parameters.
AB - Realistic simulation of leaf photosynthetic and respiratory processes is needed for accurate prediction of the global carbon cycle. These two processes systematically acclimate to long-term environmental changes by adjusting photosynthetic and respiratory traits (e.g., the maximum photosynthetic capacity at 25°C (Vcmax,25) and the leaf respiration rate at 25°C (R25)) following increasingly well-understood principles. While some land surface models (LSMs) now account for thermal acclimation, they do so by assigning empirical parameterizations for individual plant functional types (PFTs). Here, we have implemented an Eco-Evolutionary Optimality (EEO)-based scheme to represent the universal acclimation of photosynthesis and leaf respiration to multiple environmental effects, and that therefore requires no PFT-specific parameterizations, in a standard version of the widely used LSM, Noah MP. We evaluated model performance with plant trait data from a 5-year experiment and extensive global field measurements, and carbon flux measurements from FLUXNET2015. We show that observed R25 and Vcmax,25 vary substantially both temporally and spatially within the same PFT (C.V. >20%). Our EEO-based scheme captures 62% of the temporal and 70% of the spatial variations in Vcmax,25 (73% and 54% of the variations in R25). The standard scheme underestimates gross primary production by 10% versus 2% for the EEO-based scheme and generates a larger spread in r (correlation coefficient) across flux sites (0.79 ± 0.16 vs. 0.84 ± 0.1, mean ± S.D.). The standard scheme greatly overestimates canopy respiration (bias: ∼200% vs. 8% for the EEO scheme), resulting in less CO2 uptake by terrestrial ecosystems. Our approach thus simulates climate-carbon coupling more realistically, with fewer parameters.
KW - carbon flux
KW - carboxylation capacity
KW - climate change
KW - eco-evolutionary optimality
KW - trait adjustment
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105000152429
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105000152429&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/2024MS004599
DO - 10.1029/2024MS004599
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105000152429
SN - 1942-2466
VL - 17
JO - Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
JF - Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
IS - 3
M1 - e2024MS004599
ER -