TY - JOUR
T1 - Incontinence-associated dermatitis
T2 - Consensus statements, evidence-based guidelines for prevention and treatment, and current challenges
AU - Doughty, Dorothy
AU - Junkin, Joan
AU - Kurz, Peter
AU - Selekof, Joan
AU - Gray, Mikel
AU - Fader, Mandy
AU - Bliss, Donna Z.
AU - Beeckman, Dimitri
AU - Logan, Susan
PY - 2012/5
Y1 - 2012/5
N2 - In 2010, an international consensus conference was held to review current evidence regarding the pathology, prevention, and management of incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD). The results of this literature review were published in a previous issue of this Journal. This article summarizes key consensus statements agreed upon by the panelists, evidence-based guidelines for prevention and management of IAD, and a discussion of the major challenges currently faced by clinicians caring for these patients. The panelists concur that IAD is clinically and pathologically distinct from pressure ulcers and intertriginous dermatitis, and that a consistently applied, structured, or defined skin care program is effective for prevention and management of IAD. They also agreed that differential assessment of IAD versus pressure ulceration versus intertriginous dermatitis remains a major challenge. Panel members also concur that evidence is lacking concerning which products and protocols provide the best outcomes for IAD prevention and treatment in individual patients. Issues related to differential assessment, product labeling and utilization, staff education, and cost of care are the primary focus of this article.
AB - In 2010, an international consensus conference was held to review current evidence regarding the pathology, prevention, and management of incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD). The results of this literature review were published in a previous issue of this Journal. This article summarizes key consensus statements agreed upon by the panelists, evidence-based guidelines for prevention and management of IAD, and a discussion of the major challenges currently faced by clinicians caring for these patients. The panelists concur that IAD is clinically and pathologically distinct from pressure ulcers and intertriginous dermatitis, and that a consistently applied, structured, or defined skin care program is effective for prevention and management of IAD. They also agreed that differential assessment of IAD versus pressure ulceration versus intertriginous dermatitis remains a major challenge. Panel members also concur that evidence is lacking concerning which products and protocols provide the best outcomes for IAD prevention and treatment in individual patients. Issues related to differential assessment, product labeling and utilization, staff education, and cost of care are the primary focus of this article.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861159268&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861159268&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/WON.0b013e3182549118
DO - 10.1097/WON.0b013e3182549118
M3 - Review article
C2 - 22572899
AN - SCOPUS:84861159268
SN - 1071-5754
VL - 39
SP - 303
EP - 315
JO - Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing
JF - Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing
IS - 3
ER -