Incidental findings in CT colonography: Literature review and survey of current research practice

Hassan Siddiki; J. G. Fletcher; Beth McFarland; Nora Dajani; Nicholas Orme; Barbara Koenig; Marguerite Strobel; Susan M. Wolf

doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00276.x

Incidental findings in CT colonography: Literature review and survey of current research practice

Hassan Siddiki, J. G. Fletcher, Beth McFarland, Nora Dajani, Nicholas Orme, Barbara Koenig, Marguerite Strobel, Susan M. Wolf

Academics (Law)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

Incidental fndings (IFs) of potential medical signifcance are seen in approximately 5-8 percent of asymptomatic subjects and 16 percent of symptomatic subjects participating in large computed tomography (CT) colonography (CTC) studies, with the incidence varying further by CT acquisition technique. While most CTC research programs have a well-defned plan to detect and disclose IFs, such plans are largely communicated only verbally. Written consent documents should also inform subjects of how IFs of potential medical signifcance will be detected and reported in CTC research studies.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	320-331
Number of pages	12
Journal	Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics
Volume	36
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00276.x
State	Published - Jun 2008

Access

10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00276.x

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Incidental findings in CT colonography: Literature review and survey of current research practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Incidental findings in CT colonography : Literature review and survey of current research practice. / Siddiki, Hassan; Fletcher, J. G.; McFarland, Beth; Dajani, Nora; Orme, Nicholas; Koenig, Barbara; Strobel, Marguerite; Wolf, Susan M.

In: Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, Vol. 36, No. 2, 06.2008, p. 320-331.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

@article{c442841ada264384baf856e0dc008211,

title = "Incidental findings in CT colonography: Literature review and survey of current research practice",

abstract = "Incidental fndings (IFs) of potential medical signifcance are seen in approximately 5-8 percent of asymptomatic subjects and 16 percent of symptomatic subjects participating in large computed tomography (CT) colonography (CTC) studies, with the incidence varying further by CT acquisition technique. While most CTC research programs have a well-defned plan to detect and disclose IFs, such plans are largely communicated only verbally. Written consent documents should also inform subjects of how IFs of potential medical signifcance will be detected and reported in CTC research studies.",

author = "Hassan Siddiki and Fletcher, {J. G.} and Beth McFarland and Nora Dajani and Nicholas Orme and Barbara Koenig and Marguerite Strobel and Wolf, {Susan M.}",

year = "2008",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00276.x",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "36",

pages = "320--331",

journal = "Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics",

issn = "1073-1105",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Incidental findings in CT colonography

T2 - Literature review and survey of current research practice

AU - Siddiki, Hassan

AU - Fletcher, J. G.

AU - McFarland, Beth

AU - Dajani, Nora

AU - Orme, Nicholas

AU - Koenig, Barbara

AU - Strobel, Marguerite

AU - Wolf, Susan M.

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - Incidental fndings (IFs) of potential medical signifcance are seen in approximately 5-8 percent of asymptomatic subjects and 16 percent of symptomatic subjects participating in large computed tomography (CT) colonography (CTC) studies, with the incidence varying further by CT acquisition technique. While most CTC research programs have a well-defned plan to detect and disclose IFs, such plans are largely communicated only verbally. Written consent documents should also inform subjects of how IFs of potential medical signifcance will be detected and reported in CTC research studies.

AB - Incidental fndings (IFs) of potential medical signifcance are seen in approximately 5-8 percent of asymptomatic subjects and 16 percent of symptomatic subjects participating in large computed tomography (CT) colonography (CTC) studies, with the incidence varying further by CT acquisition technique. While most CTC research programs have a well-defned plan to detect and disclose IFs, such plans are largely communicated only verbally. Written consent documents should also inform subjects of how IFs of potential medical signifcance will be detected and reported in CTC research studies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44949101486&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44949101486&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00276.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00276.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 18547201

AN - SCOPUS:44949101486

VL - 36

SP - 320

EP - 331

JO - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics

JF - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics

SN - 1073-1105

IS - 2

ER -

Incidental findings in CT colonography: Literature review and survey of current research practice

Abstract

Access

Other files and links

Cite this