In the absence of a “landscape of fear”: How lions, hyenas, and cheetahs coexist

Alexandra Swanson, Todd W Arnold, Margaret Kosmala, James D Forester, Craig Packer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aggression by top predators can create a “landscape of fear” in which subordinate predators restrict their activity to low-risk areas or times of day. At large spatial or temporal scales, this can result in the costly loss of access to resources. However, fine-scale reactive avoidance may minimize the risk of aggressive encounters for subordinate predators while maintaining access to resources, thereby providing a mechanism for coexistence. We investigated fine-scale spatiotemporal avoidance in a guild of African predators characterized by intense interference competition. Vulnerable to food stealing and direct killing, cheetahs are expected to avoid both larger predators; hyenas are expected to avoid lions. We deployed a grid of 225 camera traps across 1,125 km2 in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania, to evaluate concurrent patterns of habitat use by lions, hyenas, cheetahs, and their primary prey. We used hurdle models to evaluate whether smaller species avoided areas preferred by larger species, and we used time-to-event models to evaluate fine-scale temporal avoidance in the hours immediately surrounding top predator activity. We found no evidence of long-term displacement of subordinate species, even at fine spatial scales. Instead, hyenas and cheetahs were positively associated with lions except in areas with exceptionally high lion use. Hyenas and lions appeared to actively track each, while cheetahs appear to maintain long-term access to sites with high lion use by actively avoiding those areas just in the hours immediately following lion activity. Our results suggest that cheetahs are able to use patches of preferred habitat by avoiding lions on a moment-to-moment basis. Such fine-scale temporal avoidance is likely to be less costly than long-term avoidance of preferred areas: This may help explain why cheetahs are able to coexist with lions despite high rates of lion-inflicted mortality, and highlights reactive avoidance as a general mechanism for predator coexistence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8534-8545
Number of pages12
JournalEcology and Evolution
Volume6
Issue number23
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

Hyaenidae
Acinonyx jubatus
Panthera leo
fearfulness
predator
predators
coexistence
patch use
interference competition
resource
guild
aggression
habitat use
national park
competitive exclusion
habitats
Tanzania
cameras
mortality
national parks

Keywords

  • Acinonyx jubatus
  • Crocuta crocuta
  • Panthera leo
  • carnivore coexistence
  • interference competition

Cite this

In the absence of a “landscape of fear” : How lions, hyenas, and cheetahs coexist. / Swanson, Alexandra; Arnold, Todd W; Kosmala, Margaret; Forester, James D; Packer, Craig.

In: Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 6, No. 23, 01.12.2016, p. 8534-8545.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4db140cd88f34fde9d6527e0c7e27770,
title = "In the absence of a “landscape of fear”: How lions, hyenas, and cheetahs coexist",
abstract = "Aggression by top predators can create a “landscape of fear” in which subordinate predators restrict their activity to low-risk areas or times of day. At large spatial or temporal scales, this can result in the costly loss of access to resources. However, fine-scale reactive avoidance may minimize the risk of aggressive encounters for subordinate predators while maintaining access to resources, thereby providing a mechanism for coexistence. We investigated fine-scale spatiotemporal avoidance in a guild of African predators characterized by intense interference competition. Vulnerable to food stealing and direct killing, cheetahs are expected to avoid both larger predators; hyenas are expected to avoid lions. We deployed a grid of 225 camera traps across 1,125 km2 in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania, to evaluate concurrent patterns of habitat use by lions, hyenas, cheetahs, and their primary prey. We used hurdle models to evaluate whether smaller species avoided areas preferred by larger species, and we used time-to-event models to evaluate fine-scale temporal avoidance in the hours immediately surrounding top predator activity. We found no evidence of long-term displacement of subordinate species, even at fine spatial scales. Instead, hyenas and cheetahs were positively associated with lions except in areas with exceptionally high lion use. Hyenas and lions appeared to actively track each, while cheetahs appear to maintain long-term access to sites with high lion use by actively avoiding those areas just in the hours immediately following lion activity. Our results suggest that cheetahs are able to use patches of preferred habitat by avoiding lions on a moment-to-moment basis. Such fine-scale temporal avoidance is likely to be less costly than long-term avoidance of preferred areas: This may help explain why cheetahs are able to coexist with lions despite high rates of lion-inflicted mortality, and highlights reactive avoidance as a general mechanism for predator coexistence.",
keywords = "Acinonyx jubatus, Crocuta crocuta, Panthera leo, carnivore coexistence, interference competition",
author = "Alexandra Swanson and Arnold, {Todd W} and Margaret Kosmala and Forester, {James D} and Craig Packer",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ece3.2569",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "8534--8545",
journal = "Ecology and Evolution",
issn = "2045-7758",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "23",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In the absence of a “landscape of fear”

T2 - How lions, hyenas, and cheetahs coexist

AU - Swanson, Alexandra

AU - Arnold, Todd W

AU - Kosmala, Margaret

AU - Forester, James D

AU - Packer, Craig

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Aggression by top predators can create a “landscape of fear” in which subordinate predators restrict their activity to low-risk areas or times of day. At large spatial or temporal scales, this can result in the costly loss of access to resources. However, fine-scale reactive avoidance may minimize the risk of aggressive encounters for subordinate predators while maintaining access to resources, thereby providing a mechanism for coexistence. We investigated fine-scale spatiotemporal avoidance in a guild of African predators characterized by intense interference competition. Vulnerable to food stealing and direct killing, cheetahs are expected to avoid both larger predators; hyenas are expected to avoid lions. We deployed a grid of 225 camera traps across 1,125 km2 in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania, to evaluate concurrent patterns of habitat use by lions, hyenas, cheetahs, and their primary prey. We used hurdle models to evaluate whether smaller species avoided areas preferred by larger species, and we used time-to-event models to evaluate fine-scale temporal avoidance in the hours immediately surrounding top predator activity. We found no evidence of long-term displacement of subordinate species, even at fine spatial scales. Instead, hyenas and cheetahs were positively associated with lions except in areas with exceptionally high lion use. Hyenas and lions appeared to actively track each, while cheetahs appear to maintain long-term access to sites with high lion use by actively avoiding those areas just in the hours immediately following lion activity. Our results suggest that cheetahs are able to use patches of preferred habitat by avoiding lions on a moment-to-moment basis. Such fine-scale temporal avoidance is likely to be less costly than long-term avoidance of preferred areas: This may help explain why cheetahs are able to coexist with lions despite high rates of lion-inflicted mortality, and highlights reactive avoidance as a general mechanism for predator coexistence.

AB - Aggression by top predators can create a “landscape of fear” in which subordinate predators restrict their activity to low-risk areas or times of day. At large spatial or temporal scales, this can result in the costly loss of access to resources. However, fine-scale reactive avoidance may minimize the risk of aggressive encounters for subordinate predators while maintaining access to resources, thereby providing a mechanism for coexistence. We investigated fine-scale spatiotemporal avoidance in a guild of African predators characterized by intense interference competition. Vulnerable to food stealing and direct killing, cheetahs are expected to avoid both larger predators; hyenas are expected to avoid lions. We deployed a grid of 225 camera traps across 1,125 km2 in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania, to evaluate concurrent patterns of habitat use by lions, hyenas, cheetahs, and their primary prey. We used hurdle models to evaluate whether smaller species avoided areas preferred by larger species, and we used time-to-event models to evaluate fine-scale temporal avoidance in the hours immediately surrounding top predator activity. We found no evidence of long-term displacement of subordinate species, even at fine spatial scales. Instead, hyenas and cheetahs were positively associated with lions except in areas with exceptionally high lion use. Hyenas and lions appeared to actively track each, while cheetahs appear to maintain long-term access to sites with high lion use by actively avoiding those areas just in the hours immediately following lion activity. Our results suggest that cheetahs are able to use patches of preferred habitat by avoiding lions on a moment-to-moment basis. Such fine-scale temporal avoidance is likely to be less costly than long-term avoidance of preferred areas: This may help explain why cheetahs are able to coexist with lions despite high rates of lion-inflicted mortality, and highlights reactive avoidance as a general mechanism for predator coexistence.

KW - Acinonyx jubatus

KW - Crocuta crocuta

KW - Panthera leo

KW - carnivore coexistence

KW - interference competition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84999026015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84999026015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ece3.2569

DO - 10.1002/ece3.2569

M3 - Article

C2 - 28031805

AN - SCOPUS:84999026015

VL - 6

SP - 8534

EP - 8545

JO - Ecology and Evolution

JF - Ecology and Evolution

SN - 2045-7758

IS - 23

ER -