Abstract
SOURCE CITATION: Favresse J, Gillot C, Oliveira M, et al. Head-to-head comparison of rapid and automated antigen detection tests for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. J Clin Med. 2021;10:265. 33450853.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | JC56 |
| Journal | Annals of internal medicine |
| Volume | 174 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 1 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
PubMed: MeSH publication types
- Journal Article
- Comment
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'In suspected SARS-CoV-2, rapid antigen detection tests had 67% to 73% sensitivity and 98% to 100% specificity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS