In Re Gault Revisited: A Cross-State Comparison of the Right to Counsel in Juvenile Court

Barry C Feld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article uses data from six states to analyze the availability of and the effects of counsel on delinquency and status offenses cases in juvenile courts. In three of the states, nearly half or more of delinquent and status offenders did not have lawyers, including many youths who received out-of-home placement and secure confinement dispositions. In all the jurisdictions, each legal variable—seriousness of present offense, detention status, and prior referrals—that was associated with more severe dispositions was also associated with higher rates of representation. However, while legal variables enhance the probabilities of representation, the presence of an attorney appeared to exert an additional, independent effect on the severity of dispositions. The article then explores the policy implications of these findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)393-424
Number of pages32
JournalCrime & Delinquency
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1988

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'In Re Gault Revisited: A Cross-State Comparison of the Right to Counsel in Juvenile Court'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this