Improving within-genus tree species discrimination using the discrete wavelet transform applied to airborne hyperspectral data

Asim Banskota, Randolph H. Wynne, Nilam Kayastha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

Discrete wavelet analysis was assessed for its utility in aiding discrimination of three pine species (Pinus spp.) using airborne hyperspectral data (AVIRIS). Two different sets of Haar wavelet features were compared to each other and to calibrated radiance, as follows: (1) all combinations of detail and final level approximation coefficients and (2) wavelet energy features rather than individual coefficients. We applied stepwise discriminant techniques to reduce data dimensionality, followed by discriminant techniques to determine separability. Leave-one-out cross validation was used to measure the classification accuracy. The most accurate (74.2%) classification used all combinations of detail and approximation coefficients, followed by the original radiance (66.7%) and wavelet energy features (55.1%). These results indicate that application of the discrete wavelet transform can improve species discrimination within the Pinus genus.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3551-3563
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Remote Sensing
Volume32
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2011

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We are grateful to Dr J.A.N. van Aardt, Rochester Institute of Technology, for sharing field data collected for another study. The comments from one of our anonymous reviewers were thorough and extremely helpful. This work was funded by the Graduate School at Virginia Tech through a PhD 2010 fellowship (A. Banskota, Geospatial and Environmental Analysis Program, College of Natural Resources and Environment).

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improving within-genus tree species discrimination using the discrete wavelet transform applied to airborne hyperspectral data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this