Improving referral for genetic risk assessment in ovarian cancer using an electronic medical record system

Sue V. Petzel, Rachel I Vogel, Jena McNiel, Anna Leininger, Peter A Argenta, Melissa A Geller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: We sought to evaluate an electronic referral form to increase referral for genetic risk assessment of women with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods: A form summarizing referral for genetic counseling for women with ovarian cancer was introduced into the electronic medical record allowing gynecologic oncologists to electronically submit a request for genetic services. Analysis compared patient and provider characteristics for women newly diagnosed with ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer referred 1 year before and after introducing the form. All patients were seen in a single fee-for-service university-based cancer center clinic. Results: There were 86 newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients seen before and 83 seen after the introduction of the electronic referral form. Most lived in the metropolitan area and had stage III to IV disease, serous histology, a documented family history, and a treating oncologist who was less than 10 years from completion of fellowship. Postintervention referral rates increased from 17% to 30% (P = 0.053). Factors best predicting referral were whether the patient was seen after the intervention (P = 0.009), resided in the metropolitan area (P = 0.006), and had been identified as at high hereditary risk (P G 0.0001). Sixty percent of the referred patients participated in counseling. There were no differences in baseline characteristics of the referred patients before and after the intervention. Conclusions: Referral rates increased with the introduction of an electronic medical record referral formsuggesting that streamlining the physician referral process might be effective at increasing referrals for cancer genetic risk assessment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1003-1009
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Volume24
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2014

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
Ovarian Neoplasms
Referral and Consultation
Genetic Services
Fee-for-Service Plans
Neoplasms
Fallopian Tubes
Genetic Counseling
Counseling
Histology
Physicians

Keywords

  • BRCA
  • Genetic counseling
  • Genetic risk
  • Ovarian cancer

Cite this

Improving referral for genetic risk assessment in ovarian cancer using an electronic medical record system. / Petzel, Sue V.; Vogel, Rachel I; McNiel, Jena; Leininger, Anna; Argenta, Peter A; Geller, Melissa A.

In: International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Vol. 24, No. 6, 07.2014, p. 1003-1009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{75eb8f2bfd8148d5b7c96b22755f332b,
title = "Improving referral for genetic risk assessment in ovarian cancer using an electronic medical record system",
abstract = "Objective: We sought to evaluate an electronic referral form to increase referral for genetic risk assessment of women with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods: A form summarizing referral for genetic counseling for women with ovarian cancer was introduced into the electronic medical record allowing gynecologic oncologists to electronically submit a request for genetic services. Analysis compared patient and provider characteristics for women newly diagnosed with ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer referred 1 year before and after introducing the form. All patients were seen in a single fee-for-service university-based cancer center clinic. Results: There were 86 newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients seen before and 83 seen after the introduction of the electronic referral form. Most lived in the metropolitan area and had stage III to IV disease, serous histology, a documented family history, and a treating oncologist who was less than 10 years from completion of fellowship. Postintervention referral rates increased from 17{\%} to 30{\%} (P = 0.053). Factors best predicting referral were whether the patient was seen after the intervention (P = 0.009), resided in the metropolitan area (P = 0.006), and had been identified as at high hereditary risk (P G 0.0001). Sixty percent of the referred patients participated in counseling. There were no differences in baseline characteristics of the referred patients before and after the intervention. Conclusions: Referral rates increased with the introduction of an electronic medical record referral formsuggesting that streamlining the physician referral process might be effective at increasing referrals for cancer genetic risk assessment.",
keywords = "BRCA, Genetic counseling, Genetic risk, Ovarian cancer",
author = "Petzel, {Sue V.} and Vogel, {Rachel I} and Jena McNiel and Anna Leininger and Argenta, {Peter A} and Geller, {Melissa A}",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1097/IGC.0000000000000148",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "1003--1009",
journal = "International Journal of Gynecological Cancer",
issn = "1048-891X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving referral for genetic risk assessment in ovarian cancer using an electronic medical record system

AU - Petzel, Sue V.

AU - Vogel, Rachel I

AU - McNiel, Jena

AU - Leininger, Anna

AU - Argenta, Peter A

AU - Geller, Melissa A

PY - 2014/7

Y1 - 2014/7

N2 - Objective: We sought to evaluate an electronic referral form to increase referral for genetic risk assessment of women with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods: A form summarizing referral for genetic counseling for women with ovarian cancer was introduced into the electronic medical record allowing gynecologic oncologists to electronically submit a request for genetic services. Analysis compared patient and provider characteristics for women newly diagnosed with ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer referred 1 year before and after introducing the form. All patients were seen in a single fee-for-service university-based cancer center clinic. Results: There were 86 newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients seen before and 83 seen after the introduction of the electronic referral form. Most lived in the metropolitan area and had stage III to IV disease, serous histology, a documented family history, and a treating oncologist who was less than 10 years from completion of fellowship. Postintervention referral rates increased from 17% to 30% (P = 0.053). Factors best predicting referral were whether the patient was seen after the intervention (P = 0.009), resided in the metropolitan area (P = 0.006), and had been identified as at high hereditary risk (P G 0.0001). Sixty percent of the referred patients participated in counseling. There were no differences in baseline characteristics of the referred patients before and after the intervention. Conclusions: Referral rates increased with the introduction of an electronic medical record referral formsuggesting that streamlining the physician referral process might be effective at increasing referrals for cancer genetic risk assessment.

AB - Objective: We sought to evaluate an electronic referral form to increase referral for genetic risk assessment of women with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods: A form summarizing referral for genetic counseling for women with ovarian cancer was introduced into the electronic medical record allowing gynecologic oncologists to electronically submit a request for genetic services. Analysis compared patient and provider characteristics for women newly diagnosed with ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer referred 1 year before and after introducing the form. All patients were seen in a single fee-for-service university-based cancer center clinic. Results: There were 86 newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients seen before and 83 seen after the introduction of the electronic referral form. Most lived in the metropolitan area and had stage III to IV disease, serous histology, a documented family history, and a treating oncologist who was less than 10 years from completion of fellowship. Postintervention referral rates increased from 17% to 30% (P = 0.053). Factors best predicting referral were whether the patient was seen after the intervention (P = 0.009), resided in the metropolitan area (P = 0.006), and had been identified as at high hereditary risk (P G 0.0001). Sixty percent of the referred patients participated in counseling. There were no differences in baseline characteristics of the referred patients before and after the intervention. Conclusions: Referral rates increased with the introduction of an electronic medical record referral formsuggesting that streamlining the physician referral process might be effective at increasing referrals for cancer genetic risk assessment.

KW - BRCA

KW - Genetic counseling

KW - Genetic risk

KW - Ovarian cancer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904216833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904216833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000148

DO - 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000148

M3 - Article

C2 - 24887442

AN - SCOPUS:84904216833

VL - 24

SP - 1003

EP - 1009

JO - International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

JF - International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

SN - 1048-891X

IS - 6

ER -