TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving health through policies that promote active travel
T2 - A review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment
AU - De Nazelle, Audrey
AU - Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark J.
AU - Antó, Josep M.
AU - Brauer, Michael
AU - Briggs, David
AU - Braun-Fahrlander, Charlotte
AU - Cavill, Nick
AU - Cooper, Ashley R.
AU - Desqueyroux, Hélène
AU - Fruin, Scott
AU - Hoek, Gerard
AU - Panis, Luc Int
AU - Janssen, Nicole
AU - Jerrett, Michael
AU - Joffe, Michael
AU - Andersen, Zorana Jovanovic
AU - van Kempen, Elise
AU - Kingham, Simon
AU - Kubesch, Nadine
AU - Leyden, Kevin M.
AU - Marshall, Julian D.
AU - Matamala, Jaume
AU - Mellios, Giorgos
AU - Mendez, Michelle
AU - Nassif, Hala
AU - Ogilvie, David
AU - Peiró, Rosana
AU - Pérez, Katherine
AU - Rabl, Ari
AU - Ragettli, Martina
AU - Rodríguez, Daniel
AU - Rojas, David
AU - Ruiz, Pablo
AU - Sallis, James F.
AU - Terwoert, Jeroen
AU - Toussaint, Jean François
AU - Tuomisto, Jouni
AU - Zuurbier, Moniek
AU - Lebret, Erik
N1 - Funding Information:
Contributions from the various authors were discussed and developed during a workshop held on November 9–10th 2009 for the launch of the Transportation Air pollution and Physical ActivitieS: an integrated health risk assessment program of climate change and urban policies (TAPAS) project. TAPAS is a four year project funded in part by the Coca-Cola Foundation and the Agencia de Gestio d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca. The funders have no role in the planning of study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication. All authors are independent from the funders.
PY - 2011/5
Y1 - 2011/5
N2 - Substantial policy changes to control obesity, limit chronic disease, and reduce air pollution emissions, including greenhouse gasses, have been recommended. Transportation and planning policies that promote active travel by walking and cycling can contribute to these goals, potentially yielding further co-benefits. Little is known, however, about the interconnections among effects of policies considered, including potential unintended consequences. Objectives and methods: We review available literature regarding health impacts from policies that encourage active travel in the context of developing health impact assessment (HIA) models to help decision-makers propose better solutions for healthy environments. We identify important components of HIA models of modal shifts in active travel in response to transport policies and interventions. Results and discussion: Policies that increase active travel are likely to generate large individual health benefits through increases in physical activity for active travelers. Smaller, but population-wide benefits could accrue through reductions in air and noise pollution. Depending on conditions of policy implementations, risk tradeoffs are possible for some individuals who shift to active travel and consequently increase inhalation of air pollutants and exposure to traffic injuries. Well-designed policies may enhance health benefits through indirect outcomes such as improved social capital and diet, but these synergies are not sufficiently well understood to allow quantification at this time. Conclusion: Evaluating impacts of active travel policies is highly complex; however, many associations can be quantified. Identifying health-maximizing policies and conditions requires integrated HIAs.
AB - Substantial policy changes to control obesity, limit chronic disease, and reduce air pollution emissions, including greenhouse gasses, have been recommended. Transportation and planning policies that promote active travel by walking and cycling can contribute to these goals, potentially yielding further co-benefits. Little is known, however, about the interconnections among effects of policies considered, including potential unintended consequences. Objectives and methods: We review available literature regarding health impacts from policies that encourage active travel in the context of developing health impact assessment (HIA) models to help decision-makers propose better solutions for healthy environments. We identify important components of HIA models of modal shifts in active travel in response to transport policies and interventions. Results and discussion: Policies that increase active travel are likely to generate large individual health benefits through increases in physical activity for active travelers. Smaller, but population-wide benefits could accrue through reductions in air and noise pollution. Depending on conditions of policy implementations, risk tradeoffs are possible for some individuals who shift to active travel and consequently increase inhalation of air pollutants and exposure to traffic injuries. Well-designed policies may enhance health benefits through indirect outcomes such as improved social capital and diet, but these synergies are not sufficiently well understood to allow quantification at this time. Conclusion: Evaluating impacts of active travel policies is highly complex; however, many associations can be quantified. Identifying health-maximizing policies and conditions requires integrated HIAs.
KW - Air pollution
KW - Built environment
KW - Cycling
KW - Physical activity
KW - Risk assessment
KW - Walking
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952897520&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952897520&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.envint.2011.02.003
DO - 10.1016/j.envint.2011.02.003
M3 - Review article
C2 - 21419493
AN - SCOPUS:79952897520
SN - 0160-4120
VL - 37
SP - 766
EP - 777
JO - Environment international
JF - Environment international
IS - 4
ER -