Improving health equity and ending the HIV epidemic in the USA: a distributional cost-effectiveness analysis in six cities

Keyphrases

• Improving Health 100%
• Latinx 100%
• Cost-effectiveness Analysis 100%
• Ending the HIV Epidemic 100%
• Atlanta 100%
• Health Equity 100%
• Cost-effectiveness 66%
• Hispanic 66%
• Population Health 66%
• Health Inequalities 66%
• Cost Reduction 66%
• Seattle 66%
• Optimal Combination 66%
• Combination Strategy 66%
• Quality-adjusted Life Years 66%
• Racial Health Disparities 66%
• Credible Interval 66%
• New York 33%
• Health Measures 33%
• Baltimore 33%
• Evidence-based Interventions 33%
• Service-oriented Approach 33%
• Black Hispanic 33%
• US Cities 33%
• Incidence Rate 33%
• HIV Transmission 33%
• Service Level 33%
• Miami 33%
• Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio 33%
• Carer Perspectives 33%
• Discount Rate 33%
• Rate Difference 33%
• National Institute on Drug Abuse 33%
• Implementation Approach 33%
• Ethnic Distribution 33%
• Racial Distribution 33%
• New Diagnosis 33%
• Scale Levels 33%
• Dual Objectives 33%
• HIV Transmission Networks 33%
• Epidemiological Impact 33%
• Ratio Difference 33%
• Inequality Measures 33%
• Variance Index 33%
• Theil Index 33%
• Effectiveness Framework 33%
• Between-group Variance 33%

Medicine and Dentistry

• Cost-Effectiveness Analysis 100%
• Human Immunodeficiency Virus 100%
• Health Equity 100%
• Health Care Cost 57%
• Health Inequality 28%
• Population Health 28%
• Quality Adjusted Life Year 28%
• Health Care 14%
• Ethnic Difference 14%
• National Institute on Drug Abuse 14%
• Racial Health Disparity 14%
• Ethnic Health Disparity 14%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences

• Human Immunodeficiency Virus 100%
• Ethnic Difference 14%