Abstract
Managers, management scholars, regulators, nonprofit organizations, and the media are increasingly using emissions inventory data to measure organizations' environmental performance. Whereas some analysts use total mass emitted, others have applied one or more of the growing number of toxicity-weighting databases aimed at predicting the environmental and health impacts of emissions. Little research is available to guide analysts in selecting among these databases. This article compares 13 methods in terms of their sophistication, complexity, and comprehensiveness. Seven of these methods are then evaluated as to their usefulness in weighting emissions data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (U.S. EPA's) toxic release inventory, and three pair-wise comparisons are conducted. We recommend the U.S. EPA's Risk Screening Environmental Indicators for estimating impacts to human health. We recommend the Tool for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical Impacts for estimating impacts to human health and the environment.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 143-172 |
| Number of pages | 30 |
| Journal | Journal of Industrial Ecology |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 1-2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2004 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Emissions
- Environmental health
- Environmental management
- Indicators
- Metrics
- Toxic release inventory (TRI)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Improving environmental performance assesssment: A comparative analysis of weighting methods used to evaluate chemical release inventories'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS