Improved Survival after Acute Myocardial Infarction

Michael G. Goldstein; Orlando Gomez-Marin; Aaron R Folsom; Thomas E. Kottke; Richard F. Gillum; David R Jacobs Jr; Stanley A. Edlavitch; Henry Blackburn

doi:10.1056/NEJM198712243172612

Improved Survival after Acute Myocardial Infarction

Michael G. Goldstein
, Orlando Gomez-Marin
, Aaron R Folsom
, Thomas E. Kottke
, Richard F. Gillum
, David R Jacobs Jr
, Stanley A. Edlavitch
, Henry Blackburn

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

Abstract

To the Editor: The findings reported by Gomez-Marin et al. (May 28 issue)¹ suggest that the improvement in long-term survival among patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction between 1970 and 1980 was related to improved medical care in the acute phase, continued care plus secondary prevention after recovery, or both. The improvement in survival could not be attributed to decreased severity in the 1980 sample. The authors suggest that improvement in risk-factor levels may have contributed to the improvement in survival after myocardial infarction. Smoking status and interventions for smoking cessation were not described by the authors. Since smoking status….

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1665-1666
Number of pages	2
Journal	New England Journal of Medicine
Volume	317
Issue number	26
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198712243172612
State	Published - Dec 24 1987

Publisher link

10.1056/NEJM198712243172612

Find It

Find It at U of M Libraries

Cite this

@article{c2e3df6a8caf4b58b3fdc1652a351fdf,

title = "Improved Survival after Acute Myocardial Infarction",

abstract = "To the Editor: The findings reported by Gomez-Marin et al. (May 28 issue)1 suggest that the improvement in long-term survival among patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction between 1970 and 1980 was related to improved medical care in the acute phase, continued care plus secondary prevention after recovery, or both. The improvement in survival could not be attributed to decreased severity in the 1980 sample. The authors suggest that improvement in risk-factor levels may have contributed to the improvement in survival after myocardial infarction. Smoking status and interventions for smoking cessation were not described by the authors. Since smoking status….",

author = "Goldstein, \{Michael G.\} and Orlando Gomez-Marin and Folsom, \{Aaron R\} and Kottke, \{Thomas E.\} and Gillum, \{Richard F.\} and \{Jacobs Jr\}, \{David R\} and Edlavitch, \{Stanley A.\} and Henry Blackburn",

year = "1987",

month = dec,

day = "24",

doi = "10.1056/NEJM198712243172612",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "317",

pages = "1665--1666",

journal = "New England Journal of Medicine",

issn = "0028-4793",

publisher = "Massachussetts Medical Society",

number = "26",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improved Survival after Acute Myocardial Infarction

AU - Goldstein, Michael G.

AU - Gomez-Marin, Orlando

AU - Folsom, Aaron R

AU - Kottke, Thomas E.

AU - Gillum, Richard F.

AU - Jacobs Jr, David R

AU - Edlavitch, Stanley A.

AU - Blackburn, Henry

PY - 1987/12/24

Y1 - 1987/12/24

N2 - To the Editor: The findings reported by Gomez-Marin et al. (May 28 issue)1 suggest that the improvement in long-term survival among patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction between 1970 and 1980 was related to improved medical care in the acute phase, continued care plus secondary prevention after recovery, or both. The improvement in survival could not be attributed to decreased severity in the 1980 sample. The authors suggest that improvement in risk-factor levels may have contributed to the improvement in survival after myocardial infarction. Smoking status and interventions for smoking cessation were not described by the authors. Since smoking status….

AB - To the Editor: The findings reported by Gomez-Marin et al. (May 28 issue)1 suggest that the improvement in long-term survival among patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction between 1970 and 1980 was related to improved medical care in the acute phase, continued care plus secondary prevention after recovery, or both. The improvement in survival could not be attributed to decreased severity in the 1980 sample. The authors suggest that improvement in risk-factor levels may have contributed to the improvement in survival after myocardial infarction. Smoking status and interventions for smoking cessation were not described by the authors. Since smoking status….

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0023510255

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0023510255#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1056/NEJM198712243172612

DO - 10.1056/NEJM198712243172612

M3 - Letter

C2 - 3683506

AN - SCOPUS:0023510255

SN - 0028-4793

VL - 317

SP - 1665

EP - 1666

JO - New England Journal of Medicine

JF - New England Journal of Medicine

IS - 26

ER -

Improved Survival after Acute Myocardial Infarction

Abstract

Publisher link

Find It

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this