Implications and late outcomes of type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair

Sebastian Cifuentes, Armin Tabiei, Bernardo C. Mendes, Nolan C. Cirillo-Penn, Diego V.S. Rodrigues, Jill J. Colglazier, Todd E. Rasmussen, Fahad Shuja, Manju Kalra, Melinda S. Schaller, Jonathan J. Morrison, Robert A. Vierkant, Randall R. DeMartino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: Type II endoleaks (T2ELs) are the most common cause of reintervention after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Although most resolve spontaneously, the long-term implications of T2ELs remain elusive. We aim to evaluate the impact of persistent and late T2ELs on clinical outcomes after EVAR. Methods: This was a single-institution retrospective review of patients who underwent EVAR for degenerative infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm between January 2010 and June 2022 with no type I (T1EL) or III (T3EL) endoleak seen at EVAR completion. Patients were categorized based on T2EL status. Group 1 included patients with never detected or transient T2ELs (detected at EVAR completion but not after). Group 2 encompassed persistent T2ELs (seen at EVAR completion and again during follow-up) and late T2ELs (detected for the first time at any point during follow-up). Time-to-event analysis was conducted using a time-dependent approach to T2EL status. Primary outcomes included freedom from sac enlargement (SE), aneurysm-related reinterventions, and overall survival. Results: A total of 803 patients met inclusion criteria. Group 1 included 418 patients (52%), of which 85% had no T2ELs and 15% had transient T2ELs. Group 2 had 385 patients; 23% had persistent T2ELs, and 77% developed a new T2EL. Patients in group 1 had a higher prevalence of smoking (88% vs 83%; P < .001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (33% vs 25%; P = .008), chronic kidney disease (13% vs 8%; P = .021), and a higher mean Society for Vascular Surgery score (7 vs 6 points; P = .049). No differences were found in aneurysm diameter or morphology. Mean follow-up was 5 years for the entire cohort. In Group 2, 58 patients (15%) underwent T2EL treatment, most commonly transarterial embolization. At 10 years after EVAR, Group 2 was associated with lower freedom from SE (P < .001) and abdominal aortic aneurysm-related reinterventions (P < .001) and comparable overall survival (P = .42). More T1ELs were detected during follow-up in Group 2 (6 [1%] vs 20 [5%]; P = .004), with 15 (75%) of these detected at a median of 3 years after the T2EL. No difference between groups was observed in explant (0.7% vs 2.1%; P = .130) or aneurysm rupture (0.5% vs 1.3%; P = .269) rates. Conclusions: One-half of patients treated with infrarenal EVAR developed persistent/late T2ELs, which are associated with a higher risk of SE and reinterventions. No difference in overall survival or aneurysm rupture risk was seen at 10 years, based on T2EL status or T2EL intervention. A conservative approach to T2ELs may be appropriate for most patients with absent T1ELs or T3ELs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)702-713.e3
JournalJournal of vascular surgery
Volume80
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2024
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery

Keywords

  • Abdominal aortic aneurysm
  • Endoleak embolization
  • Endovascular aneurysm repair
  • Endovascular stent grafting
  • Type II endoleak

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Implications and late outcomes of type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this