Implementation and 1-year follow-up of the cardiovascular ICU standardised handover

Monica Lupei, Nishkruti Munshi, Alexander M. Kaizer, Luke Patten, Joyce Wahr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Miscommunication during clinical handover can lead to partial information transfer and healthcare provider dissatisfaction. We hypothesised that a quality improvement project to standardise the cardiovascular intensive care unit (CVICU) handover could improve healthcare provider satisfaction and reduce information omission.

METHODS: After institutional review board approval, the operating room (OR) to CVICU handover was audited prior, post and 1 year after standardisation implementation. The medical information transferred, healthcare provider participation and satisfaction, and patient outcome data were collected. Additionally, surveys were sent to the OR and CVICU staff by email.

RESULTS: There were 68 handover processes observed. The odds of greater satisfaction with handover for providers were 18 times higher with the process post implementation (p<0.0001) and 26 times higher 1 year after implementation (p<0.0001). There was statistically significant difference between intensive care unit resident presence (45% vs 76% vs 91%, p=0.004), surgical faculty presence (10% vs 36% vs 45%, p=0.034) and surgical fellow presence (15% vs 64% vs 62%, p=0.001) between the three time periods. More information related to the surgeon (5% vs 52% vs 27%, p=0.002), the medical history (65% vs 96% vs 91%, p=0.014) and the cardiopulmonary bypass (47% vs 88% vs 76%, p=0.017) was conveyed. The duration of mechanical ventilation was shorter after implementation (2.2±2.6 days vs 1.2±1.9 days vs 0.5±1.2 days, p=0.026).

CONCLUSIONS: One year after the OR to CVICU standardised handover implementation, the healthcare provider satisfaction remained increased, more team members participated and the information transfer increased. Although some clinical outcomes improved, further studies are recommended to prove causality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere001063
JournalBMJ Open Quality
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 13 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
via email, posters and oral presentations. Additionally, we recruited physicians and nurse champions interested in educating their peers about the new process. Minnesota Health Small Grant Fund financed the QI project. The standardised handover process started in July 2017.

Funding Information:
Funding This quality improvement project was funded by an internal to our institution grant, MN Health Critical Care Small Grant Fund, between August 2017 and July 2019. No grant/award number.

Publisher Copyright:
© Authors 2021

Keywords

  • critical care
  • patient safety
  • quality improvement
  • quality measurement
  • safety culture

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Implementation and 1-year follow-up of the cardiovascular ICU standardised handover'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this