Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impacts of rotation, tillage, cover cropping, and drainage on soil health in soybean-based cropping systems: Evidence from 4–50-year trials across the US

  • Tatiane Severo Silva
  • , Lindsay Chamberlain Malone
  • , Matthew D. Ruark
  • , Chad D. Lee
  • , David Jordan
  • , Hanna J. Poffenbarger
  • , Herman J. Kandel
  • , Jeremy Ross
  • , John M. Gaska
  • , Joseph G. Lauer
  • , Laura E. Lindsey
  • , Maninder Pal Singh
  • , Mark A. Licht
  • , Michael Plumblee
  • , Rachel A. Vann
  • , Rodrigo Werle
  • , Spyridon Mourtzinis
  • , Seth L. Naeve
  • , Trenton L. Roberts
  • , Shawn P. Conley

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Recent studies highlight conservation management practices as an effective strategy to enhance soil health. However, results vary, particularly regarding which soil health parameters respond most sensitively to these practices. More studies covering a wide range of soil types and climatic conditions are needed to assist farmers in making management decisions on production practices related to soil health. In this study, we collected soil samples (0–15 cm) from 21 (4–50 years) soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]-based cropping systems trials across the United States (US) to assess the impact of management practices on soil health indicators. Soil indicators included wet aggregate stability (WAS), permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC), organic matter loss-on-ignition (OM-LOI), mineralizable carbon (Min-C), water extractable organic carbon (WEOC), total organic carbon (TOC), soil extractable protein (ACE-N), total nitrogen (TN), pH, soil test phosphorus (STP), and soil test potassium (STK). Our objectives were: (i) to assess the effects of crop rotation, tillage, cover cropping, and artificial drainage on soil health; (ii) to inform soybean farmers about the management practices that are associated with improvements on soil health; and (iii) to develop and share a unique and open soil health dataset with the research community for future global meta-studies. To assess the effects of management practices on soil health indicators, both meta-analysis approach and linear mixed-effect models were used. Two-crop rotations were associated with greater STP values compared to a single-crop. The inclusion of cover crops was associated with greater Min-C and WEOC compared to no cover crops. No-tillage showed more acidic pH than conventional tillage. The remaining soil health indicators tested did not change in response to the management practices assessed. There were no statistically significant differences in observed soil tests between tile-drained and undrained treatments. Overall results suggest that cover crops can play an important role in building soil health in soybean-based cropping systems. Our open-access dataset provides a valuable resource for future research and meta-studies, ultimately contributing to the development of more effective management strategies for promoting more sustainable soybean cropping systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number109950
JournalAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
Volume395
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2026
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
    SDG 2 Zero Hunger

Keywords

  • cover crop
  • management practices
  • soil health
  • soil testing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impacts of rotation, tillage, cover cropping, and drainage on soil health in soybean-based cropping systems: Evidence from 4–50-year trials across the US'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this