Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impacts of feeding milk replacer containing 20% or 24% protein and fat on growth and feed efficiency of beef × dairy crossbred calves

  • Jason D. Stypinski
  • , Andrew L. Plumski
  • , Dave M. Ziegler
  • , William P. Hansen
  • , Mark F. Scott
  • , Isaac J. Salfer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

It is becoming more prominent for dairy producers to breed their lower genetic merit cows and heifers to beef sires to increase the value of calves when they are sold to beef markets. However, data are currently lacking on optimal feeding strategies for rearing these crossbred calves until weaning. Therefore, the objective of the current study is to compare the effects of feeding 2 milk replacers (20% CP and 20% fat [MR20] vs. 24% CP and 24% fat [MR24]) on calf growth, feed efficiency, and scouring frequency. Forty individually housed 2- to 5-d-old Angus × Holstein crossbred calves with a BW ranging from 34.0 to 47.6 kg were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 milk replacer (MR) treatments. Calves were fed 2.84 L of their respective MR twice per day (5.68 L total) from d 1 to 42 of the experiment and 2.84 L once per day from d 43 to 49. Feeding crossbred calves MR24 increased ADG and gain per feed by 23.6% and 9.80%, respectively, compared with calves fed MR20 from d 1 to 56. Feeding crossbred calves MR24 tended to increase calf starter intake and total feed intake compared with calves receiving MR20. Results suggest feeding a MR of higher nutritive value is a simple and effective strategy to increase weight gain and feed efficiency of beef × dairy calves.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)502-507
Number of pages6
JournalJDS Communications
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impacts of feeding milk replacer containing 20% or 24% protein and fat on growth and feed efficiency of beef × dairy crossbred calves'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this