Abstract
Background: Because of the significant learning demonstrated through debriefing, regulatory bodies have recommended that all debriefers receive training in a debriefing method. However, it is unknown how this training impacts debriefing implementation with students. Methods: The Debriefing for Meaningful Learning Inventory was used to measure the application of Debriefing for Meaningful Learning (DML) of 234 debriefers with prelicensure baccalaureate nursing students. Results: Statistically significant differences were found, based on the type of training received. Debriefing for Meaningful Learning implementation improved with each additional training source. Conclusions: This study contributes to the understanding of the impact of training on how trained debriefers implement DML during debriefing.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 13-19 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Clinical Simulation in Nursing |
Volume | 32 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jul 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Funding: This work was supported by the Jonas Center and the National League for Nursing Mary Anne Rizzolo Doctoral Research Award.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords
- assessment of debriefing
- debriefing
- debriefing application
- debriefing training
- regulation