Impact of managed woodland grazing on forage quantity, quality and livestock performance: the potential for silvopasture in Central Minnesota, USA

Madeline M. Ford, Diomy S Zamora, Dean A Current, Joe A Magner, Gary J Wyatt, W. D. Walter, Sophia Vaughan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over 177,000 ha of woodlands in Minnesota, USA are grazed. In general, these woodlands are not managed specifically for timber or cattle benefits. This lack of management often leads to decreased timber value and reduced forage yields. Silvopasture is a potential alternative to overcome this lack of land management on Minnesota woodlots. However, very limited information are available about silvopasture use in Minnesota. This three-year study evaluated the potential for silvopasture in Minnesota by comparing the production of unmanaged woodland grazing, silvopastoral, and open pasture systems. Three farmers from Central Minnesota collaborated in this study to assess these grazing systems. Silvopasture paddocks were established when thinning and seeding were performed on woodland areas. We assessed forage production, forage quality, and livestock performance. Forage production was generally greater in silvopastoral systems compared with unmanaged woodland grazing systems, while forage quality was lower in open pasture systems, at least during the first year. Livestock performance was similar between the grazing systems. Results indicate that silvopasture has potential in Minnesota, but more research is required to develop specific management guidelines as well as to monitor silvopasture production systems for longer periods of time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)67-79
Number of pages13
JournalAgroforestry Systems
Volume93
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 15 2019

Fingerprint

forage
woodlands
livestock
woodland
grazing
forage production
pastures
forage quality
timber
pasture
silvopastoral systems
seeding
production system
land management
forage yield
thinning
cattle
thinning (plants)
production technology
sowing

Keywords

  • Cattle
  • Hardwood
  • Pasture
  • Savanna
  • Silvopastoral systems
  • Woodland grazing

Cite this

Impact of managed woodland grazing on forage quantity, quality and livestock performance : the potential for silvopasture in Central Minnesota, USA. / Ford, Madeline M.; Zamora, Diomy S; Current, Dean A; Magner, Joe A; Wyatt, Gary J; Walter, W. D.; Vaughan, Sophia.

In: Agroforestry Systems, Vol. 93, No. 1, 15.02.2019, p. 67-79.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{60b8c54b1f4c44f1bf4caf178579cd13,
title = "Impact of managed woodland grazing on forage quantity, quality and livestock performance: the potential for silvopasture in Central Minnesota, USA",
abstract = "Over 177,000 ha of woodlands in Minnesota, USA are grazed. In general, these woodlands are not managed specifically for timber or cattle benefits. This lack of management often leads to decreased timber value and reduced forage yields. Silvopasture is a potential alternative to overcome this lack of land management on Minnesota woodlots. However, very limited information are available about silvopasture use in Minnesota. This three-year study evaluated the potential for silvopasture in Minnesota by comparing the production of unmanaged woodland grazing, silvopastoral, and open pasture systems. Three farmers from Central Minnesota collaborated in this study to assess these grazing systems. Silvopasture paddocks were established when thinning and seeding were performed on woodland areas. We assessed forage production, forage quality, and livestock performance. Forage production was generally greater in silvopastoral systems compared with unmanaged woodland grazing systems, while forage quality was lower in open pasture systems, at least during the first year. Livestock performance was similar between the grazing systems. Results indicate that silvopasture has potential in Minnesota, but more research is required to develop specific management guidelines as well as to monitor silvopasture production systems for longer periods of time.",
keywords = "Cattle, Hardwood, Pasture, Savanna, Silvopastoral systems, Woodland grazing",
author = "Ford, {Madeline M.} and Zamora, {Diomy S} and Current, {Dean A} and Magner, {Joe A} and Wyatt, {Gary J} and Walter, {W. D.} and Sophia Vaughan",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1007/s10457-017-0098-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "93",
pages = "67--79",
journal = "Agroforestry Systems",
issn = "0167-4366",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of managed woodland grazing on forage quantity, quality and livestock performance

T2 - the potential for silvopasture in Central Minnesota, USA

AU - Ford, Madeline M.

AU - Zamora, Diomy S

AU - Current, Dean A

AU - Magner, Joe A

AU - Wyatt, Gary J

AU - Walter, W. D.

AU - Vaughan, Sophia

PY - 2019/2/15

Y1 - 2019/2/15

N2 - Over 177,000 ha of woodlands in Minnesota, USA are grazed. In general, these woodlands are not managed specifically for timber or cattle benefits. This lack of management often leads to decreased timber value and reduced forage yields. Silvopasture is a potential alternative to overcome this lack of land management on Minnesota woodlots. However, very limited information are available about silvopasture use in Minnesota. This three-year study evaluated the potential for silvopasture in Minnesota by comparing the production of unmanaged woodland grazing, silvopastoral, and open pasture systems. Three farmers from Central Minnesota collaborated in this study to assess these grazing systems. Silvopasture paddocks were established when thinning and seeding were performed on woodland areas. We assessed forage production, forage quality, and livestock performance. Forage production was generally greater in silvopastoral systems compared with unmanaged woodland grazing systems, while forage quality was lower in open pasture systems, at least during the first year. Livestock performance was similar between the grazing systems. Results indicate that silvopasture has potential in Minnesota, but more research is required to develop specific management guidelines as well as to monitor silvopasture production systems for longer periods of time.

AB - Over 177,000 ha of woodlands in Minnesota, USA are grazed. In general, these woodlands are not managed specifically for timber or cattle benefits. This lack of management often leads to decreased timber value and reduced forage yields. Silvopasture is a potential alternative to overcome this lack of land management on Minnesota woodlots. However, very limited information are available about silvopasture use in Minnesota. This three-year study evaluated the potential for silvopasture in Minnesota by comparing the production of unmanaged woodland grazing, silvopastoral, and open pasture systems. Three farmers from Central Minnesota collaborated in this study to assess these grazing systems. Silvopasture paddocks were established when thinning and seeding were performed on woodland areas. We assessed forage production, forage quality, and livestock performance. Forage production was generally greater in silvopastoral systems compared with unmanaged woodland grazing systems, while forage quality was lower in open pasture systems, at least during the first year. Livestock performance was similar between the grazing systems. Results indicate that silvopasture has potential in Minnesota, but more research is required to develop specific management guidelines as well as to monitor silvopasture production systems for longer periods of time.

KW - Cattle

KW - Hardwood

KW - Pasture

KW - Savanna

KW - Silvopastoral systems

KW - Woodland grazing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021214702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021214702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10457-017-0098-1

DO - 10.1007/s10457-017-0098-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85021214702

VL - 93

SP - 67

EP - 79

JO - Agroforestry Systems

JF - Agroforestry Systems

SN - 0167-4366

IS - 1

ER -