TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of farm equipment loading on low-volume concrete road structural response and performance
AU - Ceylan, Halil
AU - Wang, Shiyun
AU - Kim, Sunghwan
AU - Gopalakrishnan, Kasthurirangan
AU - Khazanovich, Lev
AU - Dai, Shongtao
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VGTU) Press Technika.
PY - 2015/12/15
Y1 - 2015/12/15
N2 - The rapid increase in farm equipment size in the United States of America agricultural industry has raised significant concerns regarding its impact on the low-volume road infrastructure. The study described in this paper investigated the impact of heavy farm equipment (or agricultural vehicle) on the structural behaviour of rigid pavement system. A series of full-scale traffic tests were conducted at the Minnesota’s Cold Weather Pavement Testing Facility (more commonly known as MnROAD) on two existing low-volume rigid pavement sections: (1) to study the effects of agricultural vehicle and weights, traffic wander pattern, pavement structure, and environmental factors on rigid pavement responses (deflections, strains and stresses), and (2) to compare these responses with those of a standard 356 kN (80 kips) five-axle, semi-trailer truck for assessing relative rigid pavement damage caused by heavy farm equipment. Numerical analyses were also carried out for rigid pavement fatigue damage estimations by simulating field test conditions. The Finite Element Model was able to predict rigid pavement responses under complicated heavy agricultural farm equipment loading. The study findings revealed that seasonal change, traffic wander, vehicle loading/configurations, pavement thickness, slab length and modulus of subgrade support are all important factors to be considered in designing rigid pavement subjected to heavy farm equipment loading. The use of tandem or tridem axles is recommended for all farm equipment because those axles help to distribute the load and minimize rigid pavement damage.
AB - The rapid increase in farm equipment size in the United States of America agricultural industry has raised significant concerns regarding its impact on the low-volume road infrastructure. The study described in this paper investigated the impact of heavy farm equipment (or agricultural vehicle) on the structural behaviour of rigid pavement system. A series of full-scale traffic tests were conducted at the Minnesota’s Cold Weather Pavement Testing Facility (more commonly known as MnROAD) on two existing low-volume rigid pavement sections: (1) to study the effects of agricultural vehicle and weights, traffic wander pattern, pavement structure, and environmental factors on rigid pavement responses (deflections, strains and stresses), and (2) to compare these responses with those of a standard 356 kN (80 kips) five-axle, semi-trailer truck for assessing relative rigid pavement damage caused by heavy farm equipment. Numerical analyses were also carried out for rigid pavement fatigue damage estimations by simulating field test conditions. The Finite Element Model was able to predict rigid pavement responses under complicated heavy agricultural farm equipment loading. The study findings revealed that seasonal change, traffic wander, vehicle loading/configurations, pavement thickness, slab length and modulus of subgrade support are all important factors to be considered in designing rigid pavement subjected to heavy farm equipment loading. The use of tandem or tridem axles is recommended for all farm equipment because those axles help to distribute the load and minimize rigid pavement damage.
KW - Concrete
KW - Farm equipment
KW - Finite element
KW - Full-scale tests
KW - Pavement
KW - Structural responses
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959325146&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959325146&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3846/bjrbe.2015.41
DO - 10.3846/bjrbe.2015.41
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84959325146
SN - 1822-427X
VL - 10
SP - 325
EP - 332
JO - Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering
JF - Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering
IS - 4
ER -