Impact of evidence-based standardized assessment on the disability clinical interview for diagnosis of service-connected PTSD: A cluster-randomized trial

Theodore Speroff, Patricia L. Sinnott, Brian Marx, Richard R. Owen, James C. Jackson, Robert Greevy, Nina Sayer, Maureen Murdoch, Andrea C. Shane, Jeffrey Smith, Joann Alvarez, Samuel K. Nwosu, Terence Keane, Frank Weathers, Paula P. Schnurr, Matthew J. Friedman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is one of the fastest growing compensated medical conditions. The present study compared usual disability examiner practices for PTSD with a standardized assessment that incorporates evidence-based assessments. The design was a multicenter, cluster randomized, parallel-group study involving 33 clinical examiners and 384 veterans at 6 Veterans Affairs medical centers. The standardized group incorporated the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-II into their assessment interview. The main outcome measures were completeness and accuracy of PTSD diagnosis and completeness of functional assessment. The standardized assessments were 85% complete for diagnosis compared to 30% for nonstandardized assessments (p < .001), and, for functional impairment, 76% versus 3% (p < .001). The findings demonstrate that the quality of PTSD disability examination would be improved by using evidence-based assessment. Published 2012. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)607-615
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Traumatic Stress
Volume25
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of evidence-based standardized assessment on the disability clinical interview for diagnosis of service-connected PTSD: A cluster-randomized trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this