Impact of eplerenone on cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure patients with hypokalaemia

  • Patrick Rossignol
  • , Nicolas Girerd
  • , George Bakris
  • , Orly Vardeny
  • , Brian Claggett
  • , John J.V. McMurray
  • , Karl Swedberg
  • , Henry Krum
  • , Dirk J. van Veldhuisen
  • , Harry Shi
  • , Sean Spanyers
  • , John Vincent
  • , Renaud Fay
  • , Zohra Lamiral
  • , Scott D. Solomon
  • , Faiez Zannad
  • , Bertram Pitt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aims: Although hypokalaemia is common among patients with heart failure (HF), the prognostic significance of baseline hypokalaemia and hypokalaemia during follow-up in HF patients receiving a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) remains uncertain. Methods and results: Results of the EMPHASIS-HF trial in patients (n = 2737) with HF and reduced EF with mild symptoms, randomized to eplerenone or placebo, were analysed with regard to the presence or occurrence of hypokalaemia (serum K+ <4.0 mmol/L) and the risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for HF (primary endpoint). Median follow-up was 21 months. Baseline hypokalaemia and hypokalaemia during follow-up were common occurrences (19.6% and 40.6%, respectively). Hypokalaemia during follow-up was associated with worse outcomes in multivariable analyses [hazard ratio (HR) 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05–1.52, P = 0.01] without evidence of interaction with eplerenone. In contrast, baseline hypokalaemia was associated with outcomes in the placebo group (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.05–1.79, P = 0.02) but not in the eplerenone group (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.62–1.23, P = 0.44; P for interaction = 0.04). Concurrently, eplerenone was found to be more protective in patients with baseline hypokalaemia vs. patients without baseline hypokalaemia compared with placebo (HR 0.44, 95% 0.30–0.64, P < 0.0001 vs. 0.69, 95% CI 0.57–0.83, P = 0.0001; P for interaction = 0.04). In patients without baseline hypokalaemia, eplerenone use decreased the rate of hypokalaemia during follow-up (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.59–0.80, P < 0.001). A potassium level >4.0 mmol/L at 1 month after randomization mediated 26.0% (0.6–51.4%) of the eplerenone treatment effect (P = 0.04). Conclusion: In HF patients receiving optimal therapy but not treated with eplerenone, baseline hypokalaemia was associated with worse outcomes. Conversely, hypokalaemia amplified the treatment effect of eplerenone.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)792-799
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Journal of Heart Failure
Volume19
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure © 2016 European Society of Cardiology

Keywords

  • Eplerenone
  • Heart failure
  • Potassium
  • Prognosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of eplerenone on cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure patients with hypokalaemia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this