Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impact of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on biomarkers of cystic fibrosis hepatobiliary involvement in the PUSH study

  • Wen Ye
  • , John C. Magee
  • , Suiyuan Huang
  • , Daniel H. Leung
  • , Molly Bozic
  • , Janis Stoll
  • , Simon C Ling
  • , Shruti M. Paranjape
  • , Wikrom Karnsakul
  • , A. Jay Freeman
  • , Sarah Jane Schwarzenberg
  • , Joseph Palermo
  • , Estella Alonso
  • , Nicole Green
  • , Prakash Masand
  • , Boaz Karmazyn
  • , Roger Harned
  • , Oscar M. Navarro
  • , Marilyn J. Siegel
  • , Alex Towbin
  • Adina Alazraki, Randolph K. Otto, Jennifer L. Nicholas, Michael R. Narkewicz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: The impact of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) on cystic fibrosis (CF) hepatobiliary involvement (CFHBI) is uncertain. The goal of this study was to investigate the changes in key liver parameters in PUSH study participants who started ETI compared to those who did not (noETI). Methods: PUSH was a prospective observational study of persons with CF (pwCF) (3–12 yo at PUSH entry). Linear mixed effect model (LMEM) with one knot tested if ETI changed the slope of trajectories of clinical parameters by comparing ETI to noETI. Index time (IT) for ETI was ETI start and time of ETI availability for noETI. Time zero in the LMEM was index time. Results: One hundred forty-seven participants (104 ETI, 43 noETI). At IT, the groups were similar, for age, and liver parameters. Mean duration of ETI use was 22 months. The annual rate of change over time after IT in ETI compared to noETI was significantly improved for FEV1% pre (+3.4/yr p = 0.02) and wt z score (+0.06/yr, p = 0.006). There was improvement for ETI vs noETI for GGT (−15%/yr, p = 0.01) and ALT (−12%/yr, p = 0.02). Participants with CFHBI on ETI demonstrated similar trends and also had improvements in GGT and GGT to platelet ratio (GPR), but there were no differences in liver stiffness or US classification changes. Conclusions: GGT and GPR improve in pwCF and CFHBI who received ETI compared to noETI. There were no changes in other liver parameters. This suggests an early signal for positive impact on CFHBI, but no early improvement in fibrosis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)350-357
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition
Volume82
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2026
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • GGT to platelet ratio
  • cystic fibrosis liver involvement
  • fibrosis indices
  • highly effective modulator treatment
  • liver ultrasound

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Observational Study

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on biomarkers of cystic fibrosis hepatobiliary involvement in the PUSH study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this