Impact of attachment styles on dream recall and dream content: A test of the attachment hypothesis of REM sleep

Patrick McNamara, Jensine Andresen, Jill Clark, Michael Zborowski, Cheryl A. Duffy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

48 Scopus citations

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis (McNamara 1996; Zborowski and McNamara 1998) that dream recall and dream content would pattern with interpersonal attachment styles. In study I, college student volunteers were assessed on measures of attachment, dream recall, dream content and other psychologic measures. Results showed that participants who were classified as 'high' on an 'insecure attachment' scale were significantly more likely to (a) report a dream, (b) dream 'frequently', and (c) evidence more intense images that contextualize strong emotions in their dreams as compared with participants who scored low on the insecure attachment scale. In study II, 76 community dwelling elderly volunteers completed measures of attachment, and dream recall. Participants whose attachment style was classified as 'preoccupied' were significantly more likely to report a dream and to report dreams with higher mean number of words per dream as compared with participants classified as 'securely' attached or as 'avoidant' or as 'dismissing.' Dream recall was lowest for the avoidant subjects and highest for the preoccupied subjects. These data support the view that rapid eye movement (REM) sleep and/or dreaming function, in part, to promote attachment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)117-127
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Sleep Research
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Copyright:
Copyright 2007 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Attachment status
  • Dream content
  • Dream recall

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of attachment styles on dream recall and dream content: A test of the attachment hypothesis of REM sleep'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this