TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of adjuvant therapy in patients with invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas
T2 - an international multicenter cohort study
AU - Choi, Munseok
AU - Wang, Shin E.
AU - Park, Joon Seong
AU - Kim, Hyung Sun
AU - Choi, Sung Hoon
AU - Lee, Jin Ho
AU - Chong, Jae Uk
AU - Nagakawa, Yuichi
AU - Wada, Keita
AU - Nakamura, Yoshiharu
AU - Sunagawa, Hiroki
AU - Dasari, Bobby Vm
AU - Peng, Cheng Ming
AU - Seng, Lee Lip
AU - Wolters, Heiner
AU - Gurbadam, Unenbat
AU - Park, Byoung Uk
AU - Winslow, Emily
AU - Fishbein, Thomas
AU - Hawksworth, Jason
AU - Radkani, Pejman
AU - Kang, Chang Moo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
PY - 2023/10/1
Y1 - 2023/10/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Adjuvant therapy prolongs survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. However, no clear guidelines are available regarding the oncologic effects of adjuvant therapy (AT) in resected invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN). The aim was to investigate the potential role of AT in patients with resected invasive IPMN. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2001 to 2020, 332 patients with invasive pancreatic IPMN were retrospectively reviewed in 15 centres in eight countries. Propensity score-matched and stage-matched survival analyses were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 289 patients were enroled in the study after exclusion (neoadjuvant therapy, unresectable disease, uncertain AT status, and stage IV). A total of 170 patients were enroled in a 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis according to the covariates. In the overall cohort, disease-free survival was significantly better in the surgery alone group than in the AT group ( P =0.003), but overall survival (OS) was not ( P =0.579). There were no significant differences in OS in the stage-matched analysis between the surgery alone and AT groups (stage I, P =0.402; stage II, P =0.179). AT did not show a survival benefit in the subgroup analysis according to nodal metastasis (N0, P =0.481; N+, P =0.705). In multivariate analysis, node metastasis (hazard ratio, 4.083; 95% CI, 2.408-6.772, P <0.001), and cancer antigen 19-9 greater than or equal to 100 (hazard ratio, 2.058; 95% CI, 1.247-3.395, P =0.005) were identified as adverse prognostic factors in resected invasive IPMN. CONCLUSION: The current AT strategy may not be recommended to be performed with resected invasive IPMN in stage I and II groups, unlike pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Further investigations of the potential role of AT in invasive IPMN are recommended.
AB - BACKGROUND: Adjuvant therapy prolongs survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. However, no clear guidelines are available regarding the oncologic effects of adjuvant therapy (AT) in resected invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN). The aim was to investigate the potential role of AT in patients with resected invasive IPMN. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2001 to 2020, 332 patients with invasive pancreatic IPMN were retrospectively reviewed in 15 centres in eight countries. Propensity score-matched and stage-matched survival analyses were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 289 patients were enroled in the study after exclusion (neoadjuvant therapy, unresectable disease, uncertain AT status, and stage IV). A total of 170 patients were enroled in a 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis according to the covariates. In the overall cohort, disease-free survival was significantly better in the surgery alone group than in the AT group ( P =0.003), but overall survival (OS) was not ( P =0.579). There were no significant differences in OS in the stage-matched analysis between the surgery alone and AT groups (stage I, P =0.402; stage II, P =0.179). AT did not show a survival benefit in the subgroup analysis according to nodal metastasis (N0, P =0.481; N+, P =0.705). In multivariate analysis, node metastasis (hazard ratio, 4.083; 95% CI, 2.408-6.772, P <0.001), and cancer antigen 19-9 greater than or equal to 100 (hazard ratio, 2.058; 95% CI, 1.247-3.395, P =0.005) were identified as adverse prognostic factors in resected invasive IPMN. CONCLUSION: The current AT strategy may not be recommended to be performed with resected invasive IPMN in stage I and II groups, unlike pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Further investigations of the potential role of AT in invasive IPMN are recommended.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85168670194&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85168670194&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000537
DO - 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000537
M3 - Article
C2 - 37300881
AN - SCOPUS:85168670194
SN - 1743-9191
VL - 109
SP - 2906
EP - 2913
JO - International Journal of Surgery
JF - International Journal of Surgery
IS - 10
ER -