TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of a stroke admission protocol - A quality improvement project
AU - Rather, Manzoor R.
AU - Mehta, Rohtesh S.
AU - Akbar, Ali
AU - Usman, Mohammed Haris
PY - 2010/2
Y1 - 2010/2
N2 - • Objective: To assess the impact of a standardized admission protocol for patients with ischemic stroke on stroke-related outcome variables. • Methods: Retrospective chart review conducted on patients admitted with ischemic stroke between January 2003 and December 2007. Student's t test and Pearson chi-square test were used for data analysis using SPSS 16. • Results: Significantly more patients received aspirin at the time of admission (81% vs. 67%; P = 0.036) and received aspirin plus dipyridamole upon discharge (27% vs. 8%; P= 0.001) during the post-intervention period. The use of statins increased severalfold at admission (63% vs. 28%, P < 0.001) and almost doubled (64% vs. 33%) upon discharge in the postintervention phase. The use of ACE inhibitors at discharge also improved appreciably from 38% to 53% in the postintervention phase (P= 0.047). The use of diagnostic studies including MRI of the head, ultrasound of carotid arteries, and 2D echocardiogram showed statistically significant intensification. More frequent DVT prophylaxis in the postintervention phase (76% vs. 55%, P= 0.04) resulted in fewer cases of DVT. Intensive dysphagia screening resulted in a notable reduction of aspiration pneumonia (P= 0.023). • Conclusion: The introduction of a standard admission protocol for ischemic stroke patients can enhance patient care and improve patient outcome by coordinating the management plan at various levels of multidisciplinary care.
AB - • Objective: To assess the impact of a standardized admission protocol for patients with ischemic stroke on stroke-related outcome variables. • Methods: Retrospective chart review conducted on patients admitted with ischemic stroke between January 2003 and December 2007. Student's t test and Pearson chi-square test were used for data analysis using SPSS 16. • Results: Significantly more patients received aspirin at the time of admission (81% vs. 67%; P = 0.036) and received aspirin plus dipyridamole upon discharge (27% vs. 8%; P= 0.001) during the post-intervention period. The use of statins increased severalfold at admission (63% vs. 28%, P < 0.001) and almost doubled (64% vs. 33%) upon discharge in the postintervention phase. The use of ACE inhibitors at discharge also improved appreciably from 38% to 53% in the postintervention phase (P= 0.047). The use of diagnostic studies including MRI of the head, ultrasound of carotid arteries, and 2D echocardiogram showed statistically significant intensification. More frequent DVT prophylaxis in the postintervention phase (76% vs. 55%, P= 0.04) resulted in fewer cases of DVT. Intensive dysphagia screening resulted in a notable reduction of aspiration pneumonia (P= 0.023). • Conclusion: The introduction of a standard admission protocol for ischemic stroke patients can enhance patient care and improve patient outcome by coordinating the management plan at various levels of multidisciplinary care.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77249156899&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77249156899&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:77249156899
SN - 1079-6533
VL - 17
SP - 75
EP - 80
JO - Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
JF - Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
IS - 2
ER -