TY - JOUR
T1 - Image Repair Campaign Strategies Addressing Race
T2 - Paula Deen, Social Media, and Defiance
AU - Len-Ríos, María E.
AU - Finneman, Teri
AU - Han, Kyung Jung
AU - Bhandari, Manu
AU - Perry, Earnest L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© , Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2015/4/3
Y1 - 2015/4/3
N2 - This multi-method study examines how the use of social media in a crisis campaign involving race-related issues may affect a public figure’s credibility and perceived response appropriateness. First, image repair theory is used to analyze Paula Deen’s image repair campaign in the wake of the National Enquirer’s revelation that she admitted to using the “N-word” during a lawsuit deposition. Our analysis shows her response strategies were unsuccessful because her apology did not center on the allegations, and she was contradictory in her bolstering, minimization, and mortification strategies. We build on the Deen case study results by exploring the effectiveness of tweeted message strategies in a race-related crisis via Twitter. We use a mixed-design experiment examining how public figure type (politician v. TV celebrity) and response strategy (moral defense, performance defense, defiance defense, no defense) affect perceptions of a female public figure’s credibility and perceptions of the appropriateness of the response. Results show that any of the three responses are better than no response when addressing charges of racial insensitivity. A defiance defense, as newly tested strategy, and moral defense worked better for the TV celebrity condition than the politician condition. Implications are discussed.
AB - This multi-method study examines how the use of social media in a crisis campaign involving race-related issues may affect a public figure’s credibility and perceived response appropriateness. First, image repair theory is used to analyze Paula Deen’s image repair campaign in the wake of the National Enquirer’s revelation that she admitted to using the “N-word” during a lawsuit deposition. Our analysis shows her response strategies were unsuccessful because her apology did not center on the allegations, and she was contradictory in her bolstering, minimization, and mortification strategies. We build on the Deen case study results by exploring the effectiveness of tweeted message strategies in a race-related crisis via Twitter. We use a mixed-design experiment examining how public figure type (politician v. TV celebrity) and response strategy (moral defense, performance defense, defiance defense, no defense) affect perceptions of a female public figure’s credibility and perceptions of the appropriateness of the response. Results show that any of the three responses are better than no response when addressing charges of racial insensitivity. A defiance defense, as newly tested strategy, and moral defense worked better for the TV celebrity condition than the politician condition. Implications are discussed.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84927775016
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84927775016#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1080/1553118X.2015.1008637
DO - 10.1080/1553118X.2015.1008637
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84927775016
SN - 1553-118X
VL - 9
SP - 148
EP - 165
JO - International Journal of Strategic Communication
JF - International Journal of Strategic Communication
IS - 2
ER -