TY - JOUR
T1 - Image analysis for cosmology
T2 - Results from the GREAT10 Star Challenge
AU - Kitching, T. D.
AU - Rowe, B.
AU - Gill, M.
AU - Heymans, C.
AU - Massey, R.
AU - Witherick, D.
AU - Courbin, F.
AU - Georgatzis, K.
AU - Gentile, M.
AU - Gruen, D.
AU - Kilbinger, M.
AU - Li, G. L.
AU - Mariglis, A. P.
AU - Meylan, G.
AU - Storkey, A.
AU - Xin, B.
PY - 2013/4
Y1 - 2013/4
N2 - We present the results from the first public blind point-spread function (PSF) reconstruction challenge, the GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing 2010 (GREAT10) Star Challenge. Reconstruction of a spatially varying PSF, sparsely sampled by stars, at non-star positions is a critical part in the image analysis for weak lensing where inaccuracies in the modeled ellipticity e and size R 2 can impact the ability to measure the shapes of galaxies. This is of importance because weak lensing is a particularly sensitive probe of dark energy and can be used to map the mass distribution of large scale structure. Participants in the challenge were presented with 27,500 stars over 1300 images subdivided into 26 sets, where in each set a category change was made in the type or spatial variation of the PSF. Thirty submissions were made by nine teams. The best methods reconstructed the PSF with an accuracy of σ(e) ≈ 2.5 × 10-4 and σ(R 2)/R 2 ≈ 7.4 × 10-4. For a fixed pixel scale, narrower PSFs were found to be more difficult to model than larger PSFs, and the PSF reconstruction was severely degraded with the inclusion of an atmospheric turbulence model (although this result is likely to be a strong function of the amplitude of the turbulence power spectrum).
AB - We present the results from the first public blind point-spread function (PSF) reconstruction challenge, the GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing 2010 (GREAT10) Star Challenge. Reconstruction of a spatially varying PSF, sparsely sampled by stars, at non-star positions is a critical part in the image analysis for weak lensing where inaccuracies in the modeled ellipticity e and size R 2 can impact the ability to measure the shapes of galaxies. This is of importance because weak lensing is a particularly sensitive probe of dark energy and can be used to map the mass distribution of large scale structure. Participants in the challenge were presented with 27,500 stars over 1300 images subdivided into 26 sets, where in each set a category change was made in the type or spatial variation of the PSF. Thirty submissions were made by nine teams. The best methods reconstructed the PSF with an accuracy of σ(e) ≈ 2.5 × 10-4 and σ(R 2)/R 2 ≈ 7.4 × 10-4. For a fixed pixel scale, narrower PSFs were found to be more difficult to model than larger PSFs, and the PSF reconstruction was severely degraded with the inclusion of an atmospheric turbulence model (although this result is likely to be a strong function of the amplitude of the turbulence power spectrum).
KW - atmospheric effects
KW - cosmology: observations
KW - methods: data analysis
KW - techniques: image processing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875961884&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875961884&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/0067-0049/205/2/12
DO - 10.1088/0067-0049/205/2/12
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84875961884
SN - 0067-0049
VL - 205
JO - Astrophysical Journal, Supplement Series
JF - Astrophysical Journal, Supplement Series
IS - 2
M1 - 12
ER -