TY - JOUR
T1 - Ileal pouch fistulas after restorative proctocolectomy
T2 - management and outcomes
AU - Gaertner, W. B.
AU - Witt, J.
AU - Madoff, R. D.
AU - Mellgren, A.
AU - Finne, C. O.
AU - Spencer, M. P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, Springer-Verlag Italia Srl.
PY - 2014/10/26
Y1 - 2014/10/26
N2 - Background: Fistula between an ileal pouch and the vagina, anus, or perineum is an uncommon complication of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and is a cause of considerable morbidity. Its optimal management has not been determined because of its low incidence. The aim of this study was to review the outcomes of patients who presented with symptomatic ileal pouch-associated fistulas after restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) and to present a diagnostic and treatment algorithm.Methods: Retrospective review of patients treated for symptomatic ileal pouch-associated fistulas after RPC from 1989 to 2011.Results: Twenty-five patients (14 men, mean age 40 years) were presented with symptomatic ileal pouch-associated fistulas. Median time to pouch fistula following RPC was 6.9 years (range 1 month–20 years). Fistulas were classified as pouch-anal (n = 12, 48 %), pouch-vaginal (n = 7, 28 %), complex (n = 4, 16 %), and pouch-perineal (n = 2, 8 %). Etiology included Crohn’s disease (n = 15, 60 %), cryptoglandular (n = 6, 24 %), and anastomotic failure (n = 4, 16 %). Each patient underwent an average of 2.8 local procedures or repairs. Overall healing rate was 64 % at a median follow-up of 29 (range 2–108) months. None of the complex fistulas were healed. Postoperative pelvic sepsis, fecal diversion, anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy, and fistula etiology did not significantly impact fistula healing. Three patients required pouch excision with end ileostomy.Conclusions: Operative treatment of pouch fistulas after RPC resulted in complete healing in 64 % of patients following a stepwise diagnostic and therapeutic approach.
AB - Background: Fistula between an ileal pouch and the vagina, anus, or perineum is an uncommon complication of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and is a cause of considerable morbidity. Its optimal management has not been determined because of its low incidence. The aim of this study was to review the outcomes of patients who presented with symptomatic ileal pouch-associated fistulas after restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) and to present a diagnostic and treatment algorithm.Methods: Retrospective review of patients treated for symptomatic ileal pouch-associated fistulas after RPC from 1989 to 2011.Results: Twenty-five patients (14 men, mean age 40 years) were presented with symptomatic ileal pouch-associated fistulas. Median time to pouch fistula following RPC was 6.9 years (range 1 month–20 years). Fistulas were classified as pouch-anal (n = 12, 48 %), pouch-vaginal (n = 7, 28 %), complex (n = 4, 16 %), and pouch-perineal (n = 2, 8 %). Etiology included Crohn’s disease (n = 15, 60 %), cryptoglandular (n = 6, 24 %), and anastomotic failure (n = 4, 16 %). Each patient underwent an average of 2.8 local procedures or repairs. Overall healing rate was 64 % at a median follow-up of 29 (range 2–108) months. None of the complex fistulas were healed. Postoperative pelvic sepsis, fecal diversion, anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy, and fistula etiology did not significantly impact fistula healing. Three patients required pouch excision with end ileostomy.Conclusions: Operative treatment of pouch fistulas after RPC resulted in complete healing in 64 % of patients following a stepwise diagnostic and therapeutic approach.
KW - Fistula
KW - Ileal pouch
KW - Restorative proctocolectomy
KW - Treatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919328207&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84919328207&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10151-014-1197-x
DO - 10.1007/s10151-014-1197-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 25037072
AN - SCOPUS:84919328207
SN - 1123-6337
VL - 18
SP - 1061
EP - 1066
JO - Techniques in Coloproctology
JF - Techniques in Coloproctology
IS - 11
ER -