Ideology and Specific Support for the Supreme Court

Kathryn Haglin, Soren Jordan, Alison Higgins Merrill, Joseph Daniel Ura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

We develop and assess an account of ideological asymmetries in public support for the Supreme Court. We find that specific support for the Supreme Court is more strongly negatively related to perceptions that the Court is overly liberal than perceptions that the Court is overly conservative. Our findings provide a more complete theoretical account of dynamics in specific support for the Supreme Court and indicate a mechanism behind the recent decline in the Supreme Court’s public standing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)955-969
Number of pages15
JournalPolitical Research Quarterly
Volume74
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors are grateful to Valerie Hoekstra, Jonathan Nash, Kjerston Nelson, Jim Rogers, Amy Steigerwalt, and several anonymous referees for their valuable feedback on earlier iterations of this manuscript. The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 University of Utah.

Keywords

  • Supreme Court
  • approval
  • ideology
  • public opinion
  • specific support

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ideology and Specific Support for the Supreme Court'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this