TY - JOUR
T1 - Identification of Resiliency Processes in Dual-Trauma Couples
T2 - An Exploration of Self-Reported Relational Strengths and Weaknesses
AU - Braughton, Jacqueline
AU - Mendenhall, Tai
AU - Kazlauskaite, Vaida
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Psychological Association
PY - 2021/9/13
Y1 - 2021/9/13
N2 - Objective: Empirical knowledge about “dual-trauma couples” (DTC), characterized by both partners with a history of trauma exposure and presentation of trauma-related symptoms, is especially deficient. We analyzed DTC partners’ qualitative data culled from the Relationship Evaluation Questionnaire (Busby et al., 2001) to ascertain dyadic resiliency processes within dual-trauma couples. Method: A data-reductive thematic analysis on short-answer responses of reported relational strengths and weaknesses from female (n = 822) and male partners’ (n = 831) yielded several processes that provide insight into individual perceptions, behaviors, and past experiences, and dyadic interactions that may foster or hinder effective resilience in DTC. Results: Participant responses highlighted existing dyadic strengths that fostered effective couple adaptative processes: shared beliefs and goals, mutual collaboration and psychological flexibility, and dyadic connectedness. Barriers to couple resiliency included individual perceptions, behaviors, and past experiences, and dyadic interactions that exacerbated relational instability, emotional unsafety, contentious communication, and difficulties with distress tolerance. Conclusions: Results promote a balanced conceptualization (i.e., inclusion of both adaptive and maladaptive interactions) of couples affected by trauma exposure. Implications for clinical treatment and several areas for future research are discussed.
AB - Objective: Empirical knowledge about “dual-trauma couples” (DTC), characterized by both partners with a history of trauma exposure and presentation of trauma-related symptoms, is especially deficient. We analyzed DTC partners’ qualitative data culled from the Relationship Evaluation Questionnaire (Busby et al., 2001) to ascertain dyadic resiliency processes within dual-trauma couples. Method: A data-reductive thematic analysis on short-answer responses of reported relational strengths and weaknesses from female (n = 822) and male partners’ (n = 831) yielded several processes that provide insight into individual perceptions, behaviors, and past experiences, and dyadic interactions that may foster or hinder effective resilience in DTC. Results: Participant responses highlighted existing dyadic strengths that fostered effective couple adaptative processes: shared beliefs and goals, mutual collaboration and psychological flexibility, and dyadic connectedness. Barriers to couple resiliency included individual perceptions, behaviors, and past experiences, and dyadic interactions that exacerbated relational instability, emotional unsafety, contentious communication, and difficulties with distress tolerance. Conclusions: Results promote a balanced conceptualization (i.e., inclusion of both adaptive and maladaptive interactions) of couples affected by trauma exposure. Implications for clinical treatment and several areas for future research are discussed.
KW - Dual-trauma couples
KW - Dyadic coping
KW - Dyadic resilience
KW - Resilience processes
KW - Trauma exposure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127729211&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85127729211&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/tra0001112
DO - 10.1037/tra0001112
M3 - Article
C2 - 34516225
AN - SCOPUS:85127729211
SN - 1942-9681
VL - 14
SP - 109
EP - 118
JO - Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy
JF - Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy
IS - S1
ER -