TY - JOUR
T1 - Identification of odor-impact compounds in red table wines produced from Frontenac grapes
AU - Mansfield, Anna Katharine
AU - Schirle-Keller, Jean-Paul X
AU - Reineccius, Gary A
PY - 2011/6
Y1 - 2011/6
N2 - Frontenac (Vitis spp. MN 1047) is a recently introduced, cold-hardy red winegrape that is currently the most-planted cultivar in much of the Upper Midwest. Through descriptive analysis, a set of aroma attributes common to red Frontenac table wines has been described, but the volatile compounds responsible for the characteristic sensory notes of the product have not been investigated. In order to identify these odor active compounds, eight Frontenac table wines were evaluated using stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) combined with concurrent gas chromatography/olfactometry-mass spectrometry (GC/O-MS). Eight panelists evaluated GC/O effluent using qualitative detection frequency analysis. Twenty-four volatiles were identified in odor regions perceived by panelists, including five alcohols, 14 esters, one lactone, two acids, and two volatile phenols. Twenty-three of these were confirmed by linear retention index data in separate GC-MS analyses, and 23 were quantified in runs using a known concentration of internal standard. Similar analyses of wines produced from V. riparia clone #89, a parent of Frontenac, found 16 volatiles common to Frontenac wines. A brief study of Frontenac juice with two days of skin contact suggested that four volatiles found in the wine may originate in the fruit.
AB - Frontenac (Vitis spp. MN 1047) is a recently introduced, cold-hardy red winegrape that is currently the most-planted cultivar in much of the Upper Midwest. Through descriptive analysis, a set of aroma attributes common to red Frontenac table wines has been described, but the volatile compounds responsible for the characteristic sensory notes of the product have not been investigated. In order to identify these odor active compounds, eight Frontenac table wines were evaluated using stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) combined with concurrent gas chromatography/olfactometry-mass spectrometry (GC/O-MS). Eight panelists evaluated GC/O effluent using qualitative detection frequency analysis. Twenty-four volatiles were identified in odor regions perceived by panelists, including five alcohols, 14 esters, one lactone, two acids, and two volatile phenols. Twenty-three of these were confirmed by linear retention index data in separate GC-MS analyses, and 23 were quantified in runs using a known concentration of internal standard. Similar analyses of wines produced from V. riparia clone #89, a parent of Frontenac, found 16 volatiles common to Frontenac wines. A brief study of Frontenac juice with two days of skin contact suggested that four volatiles found in the wine may originate in the fruit.
KW - Cold-climate winemaking
KW - Cold-hardy winegrape
KW - Frontenac
KW - Gas chromatography/olfactometry-mass spectroscopy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958029742&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958029742&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5344/ajev.2011.10067
DO - 10.5344/ajev.2011.10067
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:79958029742
SN - 0002-9254
VL - 62
SP - 169
EP - 176
JO - American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
JF - American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
IS - 2
ER -