ICP management in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury

a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Peter Abraham, Robert C. Rennert, Brandon C. Gabel, Jayson A. Sack, Navaz Karanjia, Peter Warnke, Clark C Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and management form the cornerstone of treatment paradigms for sTBI in developed countries. We examine the available randomized controlled trial (RCT) data on the impact of ICP management on clinical outcomes after sTBI. Methods: A systematic review of the literature on ICP management following sTBI was performed to identify pertinent RCT articles. Results: We identified six RCT articles that examined whether ICP monitoring, decompressive craniectomy, or barbiturate coma improved clinical outcomes after sTBI. These studies support (1) the utility of ICP monitoring in the management of sTBI patients and (2) craniectomy and barbiturate coma as effective methods for the management of intracranial hypertension secondary to sTBI. However, despite adequate ICP control in sTBI patients, a significant proportion of surviving patients remain severely disabled. Conclusions: If one sets the bar at the level of functional independence, then the RCT data raises questions pertaining to the utility of decompressive craniectomy and barbiturate coma in the setting of sTBI.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2279-2287
Number of pages9
JournalActa Neurochirurgica
Volume159
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

Intracranial Pressure
Randomized Controlled Trials
Coma
Decompressive Craniectomy
Traumatic Brain Injury
Intracranial Hypertension
Developed Countries
Morbidity
Mortality

Keywords

  • Decompressive craniectomy
  • Intracranial pressure
  • Traumatic brain injury

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

Cite this

ICP management in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury : a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. / Abraham, Peter; Rennert, Robert C.; Gabel, Brandon C.; Sack, Jayson A.; Karanjia, Navaz; Warnke, Peter; Chen, Clark C.

In: Acta Neurochirurgica, Vol. 159, No. 12, 01.12.2017, p. 2279-2287.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abraham, Peter ; Rennert, Robert C. ; Gabel, Brandon C. ; Sack, Jayson A. ; Karanjia, Navaz ; Warnke, Peter ; Chen, Clark C. / ICP management in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury : a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. In: Acta Neurochirurgica. 2017 ; Vol. 159, No. 12. pp. 2279-2287.
@article{e79490719e9d4baba89df0375dd3e66b,
title = "ICP management in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials",
abstract = "Background: Severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and management form the cornerstone of treatment paradigms for sTBI in developed countries. We examine the available randomized controlled trial (RCT) data on the impact of ICP management on clinical outcomes after sTBI. Methods: A systematic review of the literature on ICP management following sTBI was performed to identify pertinent RCT articles. Results: We identified six RCT articles that examined whether ICP monitoring, decompressive craniectomy, or barbiturate coma improved clinical outcomes after sTBI. These studies support (1) the utility of ICP monitoring in the management of sTBI patients and (2) craniectomy and barbiturate coma as effective methods for the management of intracranial hypertension secondary to sTBI. However, despite adequate ICP control in sTBI patients, a significant proportion of surviving patients remain severely disabled. Conclusions: If one sets the bar at the level of functional independence, then the RCT data raises questions pertaining to the utility of decompressive craniectomy and barbiturate coma in the setting of sTBI.",
keywords = "Decompressive craniectomy, Intracranial pressure, Traumatic brain injury",
author = "Peter Abraham and Rennert, {Robert C.} and Gabel, {Brandon C.} and Sack, {Jayson A.} and Navaz Karanjia and Peter Warnke and Chen, {Clark C}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00701-017-3363-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "159",
pages = "2279--2287",
journal = "Acta Neurochirurgica",
issn = "0001-6268",
publisher = "Springer Wien",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ICP management in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury

T2 - a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

AU - Abraham, Peter

AU - Rennert, Robert C.

AU - Gabel, Brandon C.

AU - Sack, Jayson A.

AU - Karanjia, Navaz

AU - Warnke, Peter

AU - Chen, Clark C

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Background: Severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and management form the cornerstone of treatment paradigms for sTBI in developed countries. We examine the available randomized controlled trial (RCT) data on the impact of ICP management on clinical outcomes after sTBI. Methods: A systematic review of the literature on ICP management following sTBI was performed to identify pertinent RCT articles. Results: We identified six RCT articles that examined whether ICP monitoring, decompressive craniectomy, or barbiturate coma improved clinical outcomes after sTBI. These studies support (1) the utility of ICP monitoring in the management of sTBI patients and (2) craniectomy and barbiturate coma as effective methods for the management of intracranial hypertension secondary to sTBI. However, despite adequate ICP control in sTBI patients, a significant proportion of surviving patients remain severely disabled. Conclusions: If one sets the bar at the level of functional independence, then the RCT data raises questions pertaining to the utility of decompressive craniectomy and barbiturate coma in the setting of sTBI.

AB - Background: Severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and management form the cornerstone of treatment paradigms for sTBI in developed countries. We examine the available randomized controlled trial (RCT) data on the impact of ICP management on clinical outcomes after sTBI. Methods: A systematic review of the literature on ICP management following sTBI was performed to identify pertinent RCT articles. Results: We identified six RCT articles that examined whether ICP monitoring, decompressive craniectomy, or barbiturate coma improved clinical outcomes after sTBI. These studies support (1) the utility of ICP monitoring in the management of sTBI patients and (2) craniectomy and barbiturate coma as effective methods for the management of intracranial hypertension secondary to sTBI. However, despite adequate ICP control in sTBI patients, a significant proportion of surviving patients remain severely disabled. Conclusions: If one sets the bar at the level of functional independence, then the RCT data raises questions pertaining to the utility of decompressive craniectomy and barbiturate coma in the setting of sTBI.

KW - Decompressive craniectomy

KW - Intracranial pressure

KW - Traumatic brain injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031900962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031900962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00701-017-3363-1

DO - 10.1007/s00701-017-3363-1

M3 - Review article

VL - 159

SP - 2279

EP - 2287

JO - Acta Neurochirurgica

JF - Acta Neurochirurgica

SN - 0001-6268

IS - 12

ER -