Hysteresis in the temperature response of carbon dioxide and methane production in peat soils

Karen Updegraff, Scott D. Bridgham, John J Pastor, Peter Weishampel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

The ability to predict the effects of climate change on trace gas fluxes requires a knowledge of microbial temperature responses. However, the response of a microbial community to temperature in a given substrate may be complicated by its thermal history. To examine the effect of sequentially changing temperature on methane and carbon dioxide production in different peat types, we incubated anaerobic peat samples from 3 types of northern peatlands, a bog, a sedge fen and a cedar swamp, in both rising and falling temperature regimes. Graphic and statistical comparisons of the different temperature regimes suggest hysteresis in microbial response to temperature, although the absolute rates at any given temperature often did not differ. Where regressions for temperature response (Arrhenius plots) were significant, they generally differed between temperature regimes. The greatest differences among treatments occurred during the first half of the 40-d incubation. Increases in carbon dioxide production were similar across all peat types, but methanogenesis varied widely: methane production was uniformly low in the bog peat but increased sharply with temperature in the other two peat types. The complicating effect of history or chronology on substrate responses to environmental stimuli may restrain our ability to model the responses of complex systems to changing conditions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)253-272
Number of pages20
JournalBiogeochemistry
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

Keywords

  • Carbon dioxide
  • Hysteresis
  • Methane
  • Peat
  • Temperature
  • Wetlands

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Hysteresis in the temperature response of carbon dioxide and methane production in peat soils'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this