Hypertrophic olivary degeneration: Metaanalysis of the temporal evolution of MR findings

Mayank Goyal, Eric Versnick, Paul Tuite, Jean Saint Cyr, Walter Kucharczyk, Waltrer Montanera, Robert Willinsky, David Mikulis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

182 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hypertrophic olivary degeneration (HOD) is usually caused by a lesion in the triangle of Guillain and Mollaret and presents clinically as palatal tremor. Although the imaging features have been well described, the temporal course of hypertrophy and T2 signal increase in the inferior olivary nucleus (ION) has not been fully characterized. Our purpose was to evaluate the time course of IVIR imaging features of HOD caused by a lesion within the triangle of Guillain and Mollaret. METHODS: The temporal progression of HOD in 45 patients with symptomatic palatal tremor was obtained by extrapolation of combined MR imaging data from six patients treated at our institution and 39 patients reported in the literature. The MR examinations and reports were reviewed for presence of hyperintense signal in the ION on T2-weighted images, hypertrophy of the ION, and an inciting lesion in the triangle of Guillain and Mollaret. The interval between the MR examination and the inciting lesion was determined. RESULTS: Increased olivary signal on T2-weighted images first appeared 1 month after the inciting lesion and persisted for at least 3 to 4 years. Olivary hypertrophy initially developed 6 months after the acute event and resolved by 3 to 4 years. CONCLUSION: Visible changes on MR images in the ION in patients with a lesion in the triangle of Guillain and Mollaret correlate well with the described sequential histopathologic findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1073-1077
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
Volume21
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 30 2000

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Hypertrophic olivary degeneration: Metaanalysis of the temporal evolution of MR findings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this