Abstract
Hume and contemporary "Humeans" have had prominent roles in reinvigorating the study of practical reason as a topic in its own right. I introduce a distinction between two divergent trends in the literature on Hume and practical reason. One trend, action-theoretic Humeanism, primarily concerns itself with defending a general account of reasons for acting, often one supposed to establish that moral reasons lack the categorical status the moral rationalist requires them to possess. The other trend, virtue-theoretic Humeanism, concentrates on defending the case for being an agent of a particular practical character, one whose enduring dispositions of practical thought are virtuous. I discuss work exemplifying these two trends and warn against decoupling thought about Hume's and a Humean theory of practical reason from Hume's and a Humean ethics. I conclude that the virtue-theoretic approach is a fruitful one for pursuing future work on Hume and Humeanism about practical reason.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 347-378 |
| Number of pages | 32 |
| Journal | Hume Studies |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 2005 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Hume and humeans on practical reason'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS