Human Rights in the Oil and Gas Industry: When Are Policies and Practices Enough to Prevent Abuse?

Tricia Olsen, Kathleen Rehbein, Annie Snelson-Powell, Michelle Westermann-Behaylo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Multinational enterprises are aware of their responsibility to protect human rights now more than ever, but severe human rights violations, including physical integrity abuses (e.g., death, torture, disappearances), continue unabated. To explore this puzzle, we engage theoretically with the means-ends decoupling literature to examine if and when oil and gas firms’ policies and practices prevent severe human rights abuse. Using an original dataset, we identify two pathways to mitigate means-ends decoupling: (a) while human rights policies alone do not reduce human rights abuses, firms with a high-quality human rights policy over the long-term reduce severe human rights abuses; (b) firms that combine preparedness—which we define as a firm’s capabilities, practices, and engagement—with a long-term human rights policy also reduce the likelihood of human rights abuses. Preparedness, we argue, can lead to reinforcement dynamics between long-term policy efforts and additional capabilities that provide a more holistic understanding of firm behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1512-1557
Number of pages46
JournalBusiness and Society
Volume61
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.

Keywords

  • business and human rights
  • corporate social irresponsibility
  • extractive industry
  • means-ends decoupling

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Human Rights in the Oil and Gas Industry: When Are Policies and Practices Enough to Prevent Abuse?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this