Abstract
Background This study evaluated a simulated pages curriculum that was developed to assess communication and clinical decision making in medical students and interns. Methods A curriculum consisting of 14 simulated pages was administered across 5 institutions to 150 senior medical students. A 3-case subset was administered to interns who did not participate in the curriculum. Six expert surgeons identified critical fails and set passing scores for case-specific assessments using the Graphical Hofstee Method. Results Participants in the curriculum demonstrated superior clinical decision making compared with non-participants across all cases scenarios (P <.01). Average medical student scores for clinical decision making were 46.9%. Global ratings averaged 6.0 for communication and 5.2 for patient care. Passing rates averaged 46%. Conclusions Participation in a mock page curriculum improved performance. The performance of participants based on expert standards set for simulated page performance highlight the need for innovative approaches to improve interns' preparedness to take calls.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 307-315 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | American journal of surgery |
Volume | 208 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Aug 2014 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This study received funding from the Edward J. Stemmler grant fund.
Copyright:
Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords
- Interdisciplinary communication
- Residency training
- Simulation
- Surgical education