How memory is tested influences what is measured: Reply to Wyble and Chen (2017)

Khena M. Swallow, Yuhong V Jiang, Deborah H. Tan

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In this response to Wyble and Chen's (2017) commentary on attribute amnesia, we hope to achieve several goals. First, we clarify how our view diverges from that described by Wyble and Chen. We argue that because the surprise memory test is disruptive, it is an insensitive tool for measuring the persistence of recently attended target attributes in memory. Second, we identify points of agreement between our view and that of Wyble and Chen. Like them, we believe that the strength of a mental representation is a critical factor in determining whether the representation persists long enough to be used in a surprise recognition task. We also agree that consolidation is one means of strengthening this representation. Finally, we suggest questions that should be addressed to clarify the factors that determine whether attended information can be reported in a surprise memory test.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1001-1003
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition
Volume43
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

Fingerprint

Amnesia
consolidation
persistence
Surprise
Recognition (Psychology)
Persistence
Strengthening
Mental Representation
Consolidation

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Attribute amnesia
  • Interference
  • Short-term memory

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Cite this

How memory is tested influences what is measured : Reply to Wyble and Chen (2017). / Swallow, Khena M.; Jiang, Yuhong V; Tan, Deborah H.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, Vol. 43, No. 6, 01.06.2017, p. 1001-1003.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

@article{8de9af5687404b37b3f77cfa0f1c3ccf,
title = "How memory is tested influences what is measured: Reply to Wyble and Chen (2017)",
abstract = "In this response to Wyble and Chen's (2017) commentary on attribute amnesia, we hope to achieve several goals. First, we clarify how our view diverges from that described by Wyble and Chen. We argue that because the surprise memory test is disruptive, it is an insensitive tool for measuring the persistence of recently attended target attributes in memory. Second, we identify points of agreement between our view and that of Wyble and Chen. Like them, we believe that the strength of a mental representation is a critical factor in determining whether the representation persists long enough to be used in a surprise recognition task. We also agree that consolidation is one means of strengthening this representation. Finally, we suggest questions that should be addressed to clarify the factors that determine whether attended information can be reported in a surprise memory test.",
keywords = "Attention, Attribute amnesia, Interference, Short-term memory",
author = "Swallow, {Khena M.} and Jiang, {Yuhong V} and Tan, {Deborah H.}",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/xlm0000362",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "1001--1003",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0278-7393",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How memory is tested influences what is measured

T2 - Reply to Wyble and Chen (2017)

AU - Swallow, Khena M.

AU - Jiang, Yuhong V

AU - Tan, Deborah H.

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - In this response to Wyble and Chen's (2017) commentary on attribute amnesia, we hope to achieve several goals. First, we clarify how our view diverges from that described by Wyble and Chen. We argue that because the surprise memory test is disruptive, it is an insensitive tool for measuring the persistence of recently attended target attributes in memory. Second, we identify points of agreement between our view and that of Wyble and Chen. Like them, we believe that the strength of a mental representation is a critical factor in determining whether the representation persists long enough to be used in a surprise recognition task. We also agree that consolidation is one means of strengthening this representation. Finally, we suggest questions that should be addressed to clarify the factors that determine whether attended information can be reported in a surprise memory test.

AB - In this response to Wyble and Chen's (2017) commentary on attribute amnesia, we hope to achieve several goals. First, we clarify how our view diverges from that described by Wyble and Chen. We argue that because the surprise memory test is disruptive, it is an insensitive tool for measuring the persistence of recently attended target attributes in memory. Second, we identify points of agreement between our view and that of Wyble and Chen. Like them, we believe that the strength of a mental representation is a critical factor in determining whether the representation persists long enough to be used in a surprise recognition task. We also agree that consolidation is one means of strengthening this representation. Finally, we suggest questions that should be addressed to clarify the factors that determine whether attended information can be reported in a surprise memory test.

KW - Attention

KW - Attribute amnesia

KW - Interference

KW - Short-term memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020122400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020122400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/xlm0000362

DO - 10.1037/xlm0000362

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 43

SP - 1001

EP - 1003

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

SN - 0278-7393

IS - 6

ER -