How Does the Dissimilarity of Screw Geometry Impact Twin-screw Melt Granulation?

Nada Kittikunakorn, Shubhajit Paul, John J. Koleng, Tongzhou Liu, Rachel Cook, Fengyuan Yang, Vivian Bi, Thomas Durig, Changquan Calvin Sun, Aditya Kumar, Feng Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations


Using a model formulation of 80% gabapentin and 20% hydroxypropyl cellulose (KlucelTM), we investigate how differences in the geometry of mixing elements in the Leistritz Nano-16 and Micro-18 extruders affect granulation mechanisms and the properties of the resulting granules. Two extruders, Leistritz Nano-16 and Micro-18, commonly used in development and manufacturing, respectively, were used. The kneading blocks of the Nano-16 extruder are less efficient in dispersive mixing than the kneading blocks of the Micro-18 due to the thinner discs (2.5 mm wide) of the Nano-16. Therefore, our model formulation could be granulated only under a higher degree of fill (DF) by enhancing the axial compaction and heating of the barrel. In contrast, the thicker (5 mm wide) kneading blocks of the Micro-18 extruder provide efficient dispersive mixing that enables granulation without axial compaction and barrel heating. The higher specific mechanical energy (SME) achieved at higher screw speeds and lower feed rates led to more granulation. Because of the difference in granulation mechanisms between the two extruders, critical processing parameters also differed. Tabletability and degradant content of granules correlated positively with DF for the Nano-16 but with SME for the Micro-18 extruder.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number105645
JournalEuropean Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
StatePublished - Feb 1 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article


Dive into the research topics of 'How Does the Dissimilarity of Screw Geometry Impact Twin-screw Melt Granulation?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this