How does social media affect contribution to public versus private goods in crowdfunding campaigns?

Yili Hong, Yuheng Hu, Gordon Burtch

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines the interplay among crowdfunding campaigns, social media activity and accumulated capital. We construct a panel dataset that incorporates information about crowdfunding campaigns hosted at one of the worlds largest rewardbased crowdfunding platforms, IndieGoGo, as well as social media activities relating to the campaign, collected from Twitter and Facebook APIs. We demonstrate that, while social media activities matter in general, buzz on Twitter is more influential for campaigns that intend to produce private goods, because Twitter is more likely to be used for objective information gathering and is therefore a better source for information about product or service quality. In contrast, sharing activities on Facebook are more influential for campaigns that aim to supply a public good, because Facebook primarily supports connections, and thus provides the conditions necessary for the manifestation of social norms. We discuss the theoretical implications for the literatures on social media and crowdfunding.

Original languageEnglish (US)
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Event2015 International Conference on Information Systems: Exploring the Information Frontier, ICIS 2015 - Fort Worth, United States
Duration: Dec 13 2015Dec 16 2015

Other

Other2015 International Conference on Information Systems: Exploring the Information Frontier, ICIS 2015
CountryUnited States
CityFort Worth
Period12/13/1512/16/15

Fingerprint

Social Media
social media
Application programming interfaces (API)
campaign
twitter
facebook
Social Norms
Service Quality
Sharing
Likely
Necessary Conditions
Social media
Demonstrate
Facebook
Twitter

Keywords

  • Crowdfunding
  • Private good
  • Public good
  • Social media
  • Social sharing

Cite this

Hong, Y., Hu, Y., & Burtch, G. (2015). How does social media affect contribution to public versus private goods in crowdfunding campaigns?. Paper presented at 2015 International Conference on Information Systems: Exploring the Information Frontier, ICIS 2015, Fort Worth, United States.

How does social media affect contribution to public versus private goods in crowdfunding campaigns? / Hong, Yili; Hu, Yuheng; Burtch, Gordon.

2015. Paper presented at 2015 International Conference on Information Systems: Exploring the Information Frontier, ICIS 2015, Fort Worth, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Hong, Y, Hu, Y & Burtch, G 2015, 'How does social media affect contribution to public versus private goods in crowdfunding campaigns?', Paper presented at 2015 International Conference on Information Systems: Exploring the Information Frontier, ICIS 2015, Fort Worth, United States, 12/13/15 - 12/16/15.
Hong Y, Hu Y, Burtch G. How does social media affect contribution to public versus private goods in crowdfunding campaigns?. 2015. Paper presented at 2015 International Conference on Information Systems: Exploring the Information Frontier, ICIS 2015, Fort Worth, United States.
Hong, Yili ; Hu, Yuheng ; Burtch, Gordon. / How does social media affect contribution to public versus private goods in crowdfunding campaigns?. Paper presented at 2015 International Conference on Information Systems: Exploring the Information Frontier, ICIS 2015, Fort Worth, United States.
@conference{0ba0873bcdeb43dfb68cd55de40fb504,
title = "How does social media affect contribution to public versus private goods in crowdfunding campaigns?",
abstract = "This paper examines the interplay among crowdfunding campaigns, social media activity and accumulated capital. We construct a panel dataset that incorporates information about crowdfunding campaigns hosted at one of the worlds largest rewardbased crowdfunding platforms, IndieGoGo, as well as social media activities relating to the campaign, collected from Twitter and Facebook APIs. We demonstrate that, while social media activities matter in general, buzz on Twitter is more influential for campaigns that intend to produce private goods, because Twitter is more likely to be used for objective information gathering and is therefore a better source for information about product or service quality. In contrast, sharing activities on Facebook are more influential for campaigns that aim to supply a public good, because Facebook primarily supports connections, and thus provides the conditions necessary for the manifestation of social norms. We discuss the theoretical implications for the literatures on social media and crowdfunding.",
keywords = "Crowdfunding, Private good, Public good, Social media, Social sharing",
author = "Yili Hong and Yuheng Hu and Gordon Burtch",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
note = "2015 International Conference on Information Systems: Exploring the Information Frontier, ICIS 2015 ; Conference date: 13-12-2015 Through 16-12-2015",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - How does social media affect contribution to public versus private goods in crowdfunding campaigns?

AU - Hong, Yili

AU - Hu, Yuheng

AU - Burtch, Gordon

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - This paper examines the interplay among crowdfunding campaigns, social media activity and accumulated capital. We construct a panel dataset that incorporates information about crowdfunding campaigns hosted at one of the worlds largest rewardbased crowdfunding platforms, IndieGoGo, as well as social media activities relating to the campaign, collected from Twitter and Facebook APIs. We demonstrate that, while social media activities matter in general, buzz on Twitter is more influential for campaigns that intend to produce private goods, because Twitter is more likely to be used for objective information gathering and is therefore a better source for information about product or service quality. In contrast, sharing activities on Facebook are more influential for campaigns that aim to supply a public good, because Facebook primarily supports connections, and thus provides the conditions necessary for the manifestation of social norms. We discuss the theoretical implications for the literatures on social media and crowdfunding.

AB - This paper examines the interplay among crowdfunding campaigns, social media activity and accumulated capital. We construct a panel dataset that incorporates information about crowdfunding campaigns hosted at one of the worlds largest rewardbased crowdfunding platforms, IndieGoGo, as well as social media activities relating to the campaign, collected from Twitter and Facebook APIs. We demonstrate that, while social media activities matter in general, buzz on Twitter is more influential for campaigns that intend to produce private goods, because Twitter is more likely to be used for objective information gathering and is therefore a better source for information about product or service quality. In contrast, sharing activities on Facebook are more influential for campaigns that aim to supply a public good, because Facebook primarily supports connections, and thus provides the conditions necessary for the manifestation of social norms. We discuss the theoretical implications for the literatures on social media and crowdfunding.

KW - Crowdfunding

KW - Private good

KW - Public good

KW - Social media

KW - Social sharing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964587728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964587728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Paper

AN - SCOPUS:84964587728

ER -